3 is the answer to your question
a. The risk of injury must be predictable.
b. A "breach of duty" is when a professional fails to uphold a level of care.
c. There must be a standard of care in place, and the practitioner must assume responsibility for the patient.
d. There must be a clear link between the treatment received and the harm.
<h3>What is malpractice?</h3>
Malpractice, commonly referred to as professional negligence, is defined as "an incident of carelessness or incompetence on the part of a professional" under tort law.
The following professionals might be the target of malpractice claims:
Medical professionals: If a doctor or other healthcare practitioner does not exercise the level of care and competence that a similarly situated professional in the same medical field would deliver under the circumstances, a medical malpractice claim may be made against them.
Lawyers: Failure to provide services with the amount of competence, care, and diligence that a reasonable lawyer would use in the same situation may be grounds for a legal malpractice claim.
To know more about malpractice, visit;
brainly.com/question/25441985
#SPJ4
The evidence that astronomers use to prove jets travel in opposite direction is Spectral lines from a very fast moving ionized gases.
<h3>Who are the astronomers?</h3>
Astronomer is a person who study astronomy which is a scientific study that has to do with space, space bodies, comets, planets, stars and so on.
Therefore, The evidence that astronomers use to prove jets travel in opposite direction is Spectral lines from a very fast moving ionized gases.
Learn more about astronomers below.
brainly.com/question/10826203
#SPJ11
Answer:
b. "One thing for sure is that they were UFOs and they had to be piloted by some type of intelligent life."
Explanation:
Well...generally the above observation may seem wrong but it isn't. That's because according to scientific point of view, if he saw a real UFO flying out in the air then it is logically possible that some being of an advance civilization must be piloting that craft. If the observation is correct then it can't just be a coincidence at all.