Yes, I agree with the researcher's method. All the values of 
in the table correspond to the values of n by using their formula.
Step-by-step explanation:
Step 1:
If we substitute the values of n in the researcher's equation and we get the right values of , we can agree with the researcher's method.
The researcher's formula is 
Here is the wombat population and n is the number of years.
Step 2:
When n = 1, 
when n = 2, 
when n = 3, 
when n = 4, 
when n = 5, 
As all the values correspond to the values on the table, I agree with the researcher's method.
Answer:
always try to draw a diagram first
Step-by-step explanation:
Jana ran The first 3.5 miles in 1/3 of an hour. remember the problem tells us that we want our answer in miles per hour or mph. so we have to set up our problem so that our units match in the end. The diagram above shows 3.5 mi over 1/3 hour. so we must divide 3.5 miles by 1/3 hour
note:
therefore
Answer:
negative 6 is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: William
Step-by-step explanation: This is true because whichever has a better gas mileage pays less, so the bigger number per year has better mileage, so 15,000 would have better which is Donald, and William has 12,000 which is worse, so he would have to pay more.
Answer:
3.
Step-by-step explanation:
