Ask question

Ask question

All categories

rosijanka [135]

1 year ago

7

Post WWII Germany was divided into four zones with the Americans occupying one zone and all of the following countries occupying

a zone EXCEPT:
a. USSR

c. France

b. Italy

d. England

1 answer:

maxonik [38]1 year ago

3 0

Answer:

b. Italy

Explanation:

Italy had sided with germany and lost in world war 2

After the Potsdam conference, Germany was divided into four occupied zones: Great Britain in the northwest, France in the southwest, the United States in the south and the Soviet Union in the east.

europeuncedu

You might be interested in

iris [78.8K]

Answer:

the answer is a time your welcome

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Anaerobic metabolism:

goblinko [34]

Explanation:

B. leads to muscle strain.

5 0

2 years ago

At a given instant an object has an angular velocity. It also has an angular acceleration due to torques that are present. There

katen-ka-za [31]

a) Constant

b) Constant

Explanation:

a)

We can answer this question by using the equivalent of Newton's second law of motion of rotational motion, which can be written as:

$\tau_{net} = I \alpha$ (1)

where

$\tau_{net}$ is the net torque acting on the object in rotation

I is the moment of inertia of the object

$\alpha$ is the angular acceleration

The angular acceleration is the rate of change of the angular velocity, so it can be written as

$\alpha = \frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta t}$

where

$\Delta \omega$ is the change in angular velocity

$\Delta t$ is the time interval

So we can rewrite eq.(1) as

$\tau_{net}=I\frac{\Delta \omega}{\Delta t}$

In this problem, we are told that at a given instant, the object has an angular acceleration due to the presence of torques, so there is a non-zero change in angular velocity.

Then, additional torques are applied, so that the net torque suddenly equal to zero, so:

$\tau_{net}=0$

From the previous equation, this implies that

$\Delta \omega =0$

Which means that the angular velocity at that instant does not change anymore.

b)

In this second case instead, all the torques are suddenly removed.

This also means that the net torque becomes zero as well:

$\tau_{net}=0$

Therefore, this means that

$\Delta \omega =0$

So also in this case, there is no change in angular velocity: this means that the angular velocity of the object will remain constant.

So cases (a) and (b) are basically the same situation, as the net torque is zero in both cases, so the object acts in the same way.

8 0

2 years ago

What is the electric potential, i.e. the voltage, 0.30 m from a point charge of 6.4 x 10-C?

Gwar [14]

Answer:

V = 192 kV

Explanation:

Given that,

Charge, $q=6.4\times 10^{-6}\ C$

Distance, r = 0.3 m

We need to find the electric potential at a distance of 0.3 m from a point charge. The formula for electric potential is given by :

$V=\dfrac{kq}{r}\\\\V=\dfrac{9\times 10^9\times 6.4\times 10^{-6}}{0.3}\\\\V=192000\ V\\\\V=192\ kV$

So, the required electric potential is 192 kV.

3 0

2 years ago

The central star of a planetary nebula emits ultraviolet light with wavelength 104nm. This light passes through a diffraction gr

Gala2k [10]

Answer: 31.33 degrees

Explanation:

The diffraction angles $\theta_{n}$ when we have a slit divided into $n$ parts are obtained by the following equation:

$dsin\theta_{n}=n\lambda$ (1)

Where:

$d$ is the width of the slit

$\lambda$ is the wavelength of the light

$n$ is an integer different from zero.

Now, the first-order diffraction angle is given when $n=1$ , hence equation (1) becomes:

$dsin\theta_{1}=\lambda$ (2)

Now we have to find the value of $\theta_{1}$ :

$sin\theta_{1}=\frac{\lambda}{d}$

$\theta_{1}=arcsin(\frac{\lambda}{d})$ (3)

We know:

$\lambda=104nm=104(10)^{-9}m$

In addition we are told the diffraction grating has 5000 slits per mm, this means:

$d=\frac{1mm}{5000}=\frac{1(10)^{-3}m}{5000}$

Substituting the known values in (3):

$\theta_{1}=arcsin(\frac{104(10)^{-9}m}{\frac{1(10)^{-3}m}{5000}})$

$\theta_{1}=arcsin(0.52)$

<u>Finally:</u>

$\theta_{1}=31.33\º$ >>>This is the first-order diffraction angle

4 0

2 years ago