1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nuetrik [128]
2 years ago
12

You can take your heart rate using:

Physics
1 answer:
kiruha [24]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A and B

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Two magnets are placed near each other on a space station orbiting Earth.
dimulka [17.4K]

Answer: A. They will be repelled because they are in each other's magnetic

field.

Explanation: Apex and gravity and electrical don't have effect on magnets magnetic field.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If a person consumes an extra 500 calories per day, how long would it take before he or she gained one pound of fat?
Ostrovityanka [42]
The answer is A. 10 days
6 0
4 years ago
Do you think there are other planets outside of our solar system? Support your response with facts
Agata [3.3K]


The habitable zone is the range of distances from a star where a planet’s temperature allows liquid water oceans, critical for life on Earth. The earliest definition of the zone was based on simple thermal equilibrium, but current calculations of the habitable zone include many other factors, including the greenhouse effect of a planet’s atmosphere. This makes the boundaries of a habitable zone "fuzzy."



Astronomers announced in August 2016 that they may have found such a planet orbiting Proxima Centauri. The newfound world, known as Proxima b, is about 1.3 times more massive than Earth, which suggests that the exoplanet is a rocky world, researchers said. The planet is also in the star's habitable zone, just 4.7 million miles (7.5 million kilometers) from its host star. It completes one orbit every 11.2 Earth-days. As a result, it's likely that the exoplanet is tidally locked, meaning it always shows the same face to its host star, just as the moon shows only one face (the near side) to Earth.



The young sun would have had a very strong magnetic field, whose lines of force reached out into the disk of swirling gas from which the planets would form. These field lines connected with the charged particles in the gas, and acted like anchors, slowing down the spin of the forming sun and spinning up the gas that would eventually turn into the planets. Most stars like the sun rotate slowly, so astronomers inferred that the same “magnetic braking” occurred for them, meaning that planet formation must have occurred for them. The implication: Planets must be common around sun-like
A Canadian team discovered a Jupiter-size planet around Gamma Cephei in 1988, but because its orbit was much smaller than Jupiter’s, the scientists did not claim a definitive planet detection. “We weren’t expecting planets like that. It was different enough from a planet in our own solar system that they were cautious," Matthews said.
Most of the first exoplanet discoveries were huge Jupiter-size (or larger) gas giants orbiting close to their parent stars. That's because astronomers were relying on the radial velocity technique, which measures how much a star “wobbles” when a planet or planets orbit it. These large planets close in produce a correspondingly big effect on their parent star, causing an easier-to-detect wobble.
Before the era of exoplanet discoveries, instruments could only measure stellar motions down to a kilometer per second, too imprecise to detect a wobble due to a planet. Now, some instruments can measure velocities as low as a centimeter per second, according to Matthews. “Partly due to better instrumentation, but also because astronomers are now more experienced in teasing subtle signals out of the data.”

Today, there are more than 1,000 confirmed exoplanets discovered by a single telescope: the Kepler space telescope, which reached orbit in 2009 and hunted for habitable planets for four years. Kepler uses a technique called the “transit” method, measuring how much a star's light dims when a planet passes in front of it.

Kepler has revealed a cornucopia of different types of planets. Besides gas giants and terrestrial planets, it has helped define a whole new class known as “super-Earths”: planets that are between the size of Earth and Neptune. Some of these are in the habitable zones of their stars, but astrobiologists are going back to the drawing board to consider how life might develop on such worlds.

In 2014, Kepler astronomers (including Matthews’ former student Jason Rowe) unveiled a “verification by multiplicity” method that should increase the rate at which astronomers promote candidate planets to confirmed planets. The technique is based on orbital stability — many transits of a star occurring with short periods can only be due to planets in small orbits, since multiply eclipsing stars that might mimic would gravitationally eject each other from the system in just a few million years.

While the Kepler (and French CoRoT) planet-hunting satellites have ended their original missions, scientists are still mining the data for discoveries, and there are more to come. MOST is still operating, and the NASA TESS (Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite), Swiss CHEOPS (Characterizing ExOPlanets Satellite) and ESA’s PLATO missions will soon pick up the transit search from space. From the ground, the HARPS spectrograph on the European Southern Observatory's La Silla 3.6-meter telescope in Chile is leading the Doppler wobble search, but there are many other telescopes in the hunt.

With almost 2,000 to choose from, it’s hard to narrow down a few. Small solid planets in the habitable zone are automatically standouts, but Matthews singled out five other exoplanets that have expanded our perspective on how planets form and
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following are true for acceleration?
Fittoniya [83]

The SI unit for acceleration is m/s2 ( D)

6 0
3 years ago
What is the Difference between accuracy and precision ?<br>​
Pie

Answer:

Accuracy measures how close results are to the true or known value. Precision, on the other hand, measures how close results are to one another.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What did nicolaus copernicus discover about the universe
    12·1 answer
  • Is compound a subatomic particle
    7·1 answer
  • HURRY PLZ
    9·2 answers
  • How are Aurora produced?
    13·1 answer
  • What type of waves move energy forward, but the source moves up and down?
    11·1 answer
  • A garden roller is pulled with a force of 200N, acting at an angle of 50 degree with the ground level.find the force pulling the
    9·1 answer
  • An instructor wishes to determine the wavelength of the light in a laser beam. To do so, he directs the beam toward a partition
    9·1 answer
  • I have no clue how to do this at all
    11·1 answer
  • The _________ is the difference between two times
    13·1 answer
  • 2. The longest snake ever found was a python that was 10.0 m long. Sup-
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!