1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alchen [17]
2 years ago
11

1. A cylindrical casting is 0.3 m in diameter and 0.5 m in length. Another casting has the same metal is rectangular in cross-se

ction, with a width-to-thickness ratio of 3, and has the same length and cross-sectional area as the cylindrical casting. Both pieces are cast under the same conditions. What is the difference in the solidification times of the two castings
Engineering
1 answer:
Lorico [155]2 years ago
3 0

Based on the Chvorinov's rule, the diference in the <em>solidification</em> times of the two castings is 14.092 times the <em>solidification</em> time of the prism casting.

<h3>How to apply the Chvorinov's rule for casting processes</h3>

The Chvorinov's rule is an empirical method to estimate the cooling time of a casting in terms of a <em>reference</em> time. This rule states that cooling time (<em>t</em>) is directly proportional to the square of the volume (<em>V</em>), in cubic meters, divided to the surface area (<em>A</em>), in square meters. Now we proceed to model each casting:

<h3>Cylindrical casting</h3>

t = C · [0.25π · D² · L/(0.5π · D² + π · D · L)]²

t = C · [0.25 · D · L/(0.5 · D + L)]²    (1)

<h3>Prism casting</h3>

t' = C · [3 · T² · L/(6 · T · L + 2 · T · L + 6 · T²)]²

t' = C · [3 · T · L/(8 · L + 6 · T)]²     (2)

<h3>Relationship between the cross sections of both castings</h3>

3 · T² = 0.25π · D²     (3)

Where:

  • <em>t</em> - Cooling time of the cylindrical casting, in time unit.
  • <em>t'</em> - Cooling time of the prism casting, in time unit.
  • <em>C</em> - Cooling factor, in time unit per square meter.
  • <em>D</em> - Diameter of the cylinder, in meters.
  • <em>L</em> - Length of the casting, in meters.
  • <em>T</em> - Width of the cross section of the prism casting, in meters.

If we know that <em>D =</em> <em>0.3 m</em>, then the thickness of the prism casting is:

T = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{12} }\cdot D

<em>T ≈ 0.153 m</em>

<em />

And (1) and (2) simplified into these forms:

<h3>Cylindrical casting</h3>

t = C · {0.25π · (0.3 m) · (0.5 m)/[0.5 · (0.3 m) + 0.5 m]}²

t = 0.0329 · C     (1b)

<h3>Prism casting</h3>

t' = C · {3 · (0.153 m) · (0.5 m)/[8 · (0.5 m) + 6 · (0.153 m)]}²

t' = 0.00218 · C     (2b)

Lastly we find the <em>percentual</em> difference in the solidification times of the two castings by using the following expression:

<em>r = (</em>1 <em>- t'/t) ×</em> 100 %

<em>r = (</em>1 <em>-</em> 0.00218<em>/</em>0.0329<em>) ×</em> 100 %

<em>r =</em> 93.374 %

The <em>cooling</em> time of the <em>prism</em> casting is 6.626 % of the <em>solidification</em> time of the <em>cylindrical</em> casting. The diference in the <em>solidification</em> times of the two castings is 14.092 times the <em>solidification</em> time of the <em>prism</em> casting. \blacksquare

To learn more on solidification times, we kindly invite to check this verified question: brainly.com/question/13536247

You might be interested in
You are a designer of a new processor. You have to choose between two possible implementations (called M1 and M2) of the same ar
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

A ) CPI : M1 = 2.4 , M2 = 2.65

B ) MIPS : M1 = 1083, M2 = 1056

C ) The machine that has a better performance based on MIPS is M1 and this is  by 27 million number of instructions per sec

Explanation:

A) The CPI for each machine

CPI = ( Total number of execution cycles ) / ( instruction counter executed )

For Machine 1 ( M1 )

we have to make some assumptions : number of instructions = 10

number of times A was executed = 4 , Number of times B was executed = 2.5 , number of times C was executed = 2.5, Number of times D was executed = 1. and this was based on the frequency given above

hence CPI for M1 =[ ( 1 * 4 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 5 * 1 ) ] / 10

       CPI  for M1 = 2.4

For Machine 2 ( M2 )

we have to make some assumptions : number of instructions = 10

number of times A was executed = 4 , Number of times B was executed = 2.  number of times C was executed = 1.5, Number of times D was executed = 2.5 times. and this was based on the frequency given above

Hence CPI  for M1 = [ ( 2 * 4 ) + ( 2 * 2 ) + ( 3 * 1.5 ) + ( 4 * 2.5 ) ] / 10

            CPI for M2 = 2.65

B ) Calculate the native MIPS  ratings for M1 and M2

MIPS = ( instruction counts ) / ( Execution time * 10^6 )

For M1

Assumptions : number of instructions executed = 10

                        each clock cycle = 0.3846 * 10^-9.      frequency = 2.6 Ghz

first we calculate the total execution time which is equal to :

= [ ( 1 * 4 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 3 * 2.5 ) + ( 5 * 1 ) ] * 0.3846 * 10 ^-9

= 9.2304 * 10 ^-9 secs

therefore the MIPS for M1

= 10 / ( 9.2304 * 10^-9 ) * 10^6  = 1083

                                         

For M2

Assumptions : number of instructions executed = 10

                        each clock cycle = 0.3846 * 10^-9.      frequency = 2.8 Ghz

first we calculate the total execution time which is equal to :

= [ (2*4) + (2*2) + (3 * 1.5 ) + ( 4 * 2.5 ) ] * 0.3846 * 10^-9 = 9.4631 * 10^-9 secs

therefor the MIPS for M2

= 10 / ( 9.4631*10^-9) * 10^6 = 1056

C ) The machine that has a better performance based on MIPS is M1 and this is by 27 million number of instructions per sec

8 0
3 years ago
What’s the answer???
Zanzabum
D IS THE ANSWER ❤︎❤︎❤︎spread love and share knowledge
3 0
3 years ago
What steps would you take to design an improved toothpaste container?
algol [13]

Answer:

A. Identify the need, recognize limitations of current toothpaste containers, and then brainstorm ideas on how to improve the existing

Explanation:

To design an improved toothpaste container, we must identify the needs of the customer, one of the major need is to make the container attractive to the sight. This is the first thing that will prompt a customer to wanting to buy the product (The reflectance/appearance).

Then recognize the limitation of the current design, what needed change. This will help in determining what is needed to be included and what should be removed based on identified customers need.

The last step is to brainstorm ideas on how to improve the existing designs. Get ideas from other colleagues because there is a saying that two heads are better than one. This will help in coming to a reasonable conclusion on the new design after taking careful consideration of people's opinion.

7 0
3 years ago
True/False
sweet [91]

Answer:

false jdbebheuwowjwjsisidhhdd

7 0
3 years ago
Select the correct text in the passage.
sineoko [7]
It is habahi Yw with yuuuuuy I am a little more confused about
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why should engineers avoid obvious patterns?
    13·2 answers
  • Consider an InSb NW with ballistic mean free path of 150nm. Calculate the current through a 250nm long InSb NW when a 100mV bias
    6·1 answer
  • Two parts are to be assembled in a way that if one part fails, the entire assembly fails. Each of the parts have undergone exten
    15·1 answer
  • QUESTIONS
    12·1 answer
  • A steam power plant operating on a simple ideal Rankine cycle maintains the boiler at 6000 kPa, the turbine inlet at 600 °C, and
    11·1 answer
  • 3.24 Program: Drawing a half arrow (Java) This program outputs a downwards facing arrow composed of a rectangle and a right tria
    12·1 answer
  • Which of these is an example of a service job?
    7·1 answer
  • Explain the problems and their possible solution for electricity problems ?​
    8·1 answer
  • Help please!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • Silicon chips are used primarily in ?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!