Wouldn’t it be “B”? Can’t soemthing still get corroded under paint?
a) f2 loses electrons and is oxidised. li gains electrons and is reduced
c)sn2+ loses electrons and is oxidised.Al gains electrons and is reduced
b)br2 loses electrons and is oxidised. I- in KI gains electrons and is reduced
Answer:
The average kinetic energy of A is greater than that of B.
Explanation:
The temperature of an object is directly proportional to the average kinetic energy of the particles in the object. For instance, for an ideal gas, we have
where
KE is the kinetic energy
k is the Boltzmann constant
T the absolute temperature of the gas
Therefore, this means that in a hotter object the average kinetic energy of the particles is higher than the average kinetic energy of the particles in a colder object.
Moreover, the laws of thermodynamics tell us that heat is always transferred from a hotter object (higher temperature) to a colder object (lower temperature).
In this problem heat is transferred from sample A to sample B. Therefore, this means that object A has higher temperature, and therefore, higher average kinetic energy. So the correct answer is
The average kinetic energy of A is greater than that of B.
Answer:
1. The α particles were repelled by electrons.
Explanation:
The gold foil experiment was performed by Rutherford and his research group in 1911 (at the beginning of the 20th century). In this experiment, α particles were bombed to gold foils, and films were placed surround it to collect the particles.
It was observed that most of the particles passed through of the foil undeflected, and for that, Rutherford stated that the atom was a "huge empty". Some particles were deflected, because they're attracted to the electrons at the electrosphere, and a small number of particles were complete deflected to the origin because they chocked with the small positive nuclei.
Thus, the experiment suggested the nuclear model of the atom, called the planetary model, that was improved after by Bohr and other scientists in the quantum model.
Answer:
Peer review is a quality control measure for medical research. It
is a process in which professionals review each other's work to
make sure that it is accurate, relevant, and significant. Scientific
researchers aim to improve medical knowledge and find better
ways to treat disease.
if I am right mark the answer as brainliest
