1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Allisa [31]
2 years ago
13

Ball 1, with a mass of 100 g and traveling at 10 m/s, collides head-on with ball 2, which has a mass of 300 g and is initially a

t rest. What are the final velocities of each ball if the collision is (a) perfectly elastic
Physics
1 answer:
qaws [65]2 years ago
5 0
There is 4000 balls in the earth of the world why is that so hard for you
You might be interested in
What would you do to increase resistance
ratelena [41]

Answer:

If this is electrical currents , make the wire longer, smaller diameter wires, heat it up

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How much energy is needed to generate 0.71 x 10-16 kg of mass?
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

6.39 J of energy is needed to generate 0.71 * 10⁻¹⁶ kg mass

Explanation:

According to the Equation: E = mc²

where the mass, m = 0.71 * 10⁻¹⁶ kg

the speed of light, c = 3 * 10⁸ m/s

The amount of energy needed to generate a mass of 0.71 * 10⁻¹⁶ kg is calculated as follows:

E = (0.71 * 10⁻¹⁶) (3 * 10⁸)²

E = 0.71 * 10⁻¹⁶ * 9 * 10¹⁶

E = 0.71 * 9

E = 6.39 J

6 0
3 years ago
When object goes under acceleration
lidiya [134]

when object goes under acceleration

c).its velocity always increases

<h3><u>Additional</u><u> </u><u>information</u><u>:</u><u>-</u></h3>

★ Acceleration: Rate of increase in velocity.

★ Velocity: Distance travelled by a body per unit time in given direction is called velocity .

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is it so good for scientists to be skeptical
IceJOKER [234]
Its good for a scientist to be skeptical because they dont willingly accept new ideas without thoroughly going over the research themselves and attempting to disprove a theory. skeptical scientists often reveal new information through doing their own examinations of a concept, which is why they are valuable scientists
7 0
3 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How are land-use laws in the United States different from the land-use laws inherited from England?
    13·2 answers
  • A 190 g rock at 20°C is completely immersed in 600 g of water at 80°C. Which one of the following statements is true right after
    9·1 answer
  • Is it possible for a baseball to have as large a momentum as a much more massive bowling ball
    13·1 answer
  • What is Acceleration?
    15·2 answers
  • The Pioneer 10 spacecraft has which of the following on board?
    8·2 answers
  • If the kinetic and potential energy in a system are equal, then the potential energy increases. What happens as a result?
    5·1 answer
  • In the equation for elastic potential energy below, what is represented by the symbol k? Ee = ½ × k × e²
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the operation of a capacitor in a circuit
    11·1 answer
  • An asteroid has acquired a net negative charge of 149 C from being bombarded by the solar wind over the years, and is currently
    7·1 answer
  • what is the minimum heat if A 500cm³ of water is to be heated from a room temperature (28°C) to 100°C in order to prepare hot cu
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!