All categories

2 years ago

Mathew sells half the books in his library. After

2 answers:

8 0

You’d get 192 because first, you would subtract 6 from 102.

102 - 6 = 96

Then, multiply 96 by 2 to get 192, the original amount Matthew had.

vodomira [7]2 years ago

5 0

198?? i multiplied 102 by 2 and subtracted 6 to get tht answer.

You might be interested in

A game has 50 cards with 10 each numbered 1 to 5,and a player must draw a 2 or a 3 to move out of the “start” position.

fenix001 [56]

Answer:

que?

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

El 10% de 2cm cubicos

egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

2 years ago

Tony has 6 rectangle shaped pieces of wood. He places them down right next to each other. The dimensions of the wood shape are 2

sleet_krkn [62]

Answer: The whole area of all the wood is 36

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for area of a rectangle is length times width. A=lw

You plug the numbers into the formula: A=2*3 = 6

The area for one piece of wood is 6 ft

If you take multiply one area of wood by the amount of wood - you get the whole area amount of all the wood. So 6*6 = 36.

5 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

Firlakuza [10]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .