Answer:
Mario uses a hot plate to heat a beaker of 50mL of water. He used a thermometer to measure the
temperature of the water. The water in the beaker began to boil when it reached the temperature of
100'C. If Mario completes the same experiment with 25mL of water, what would happen to the boiling
point?
a) The water will not reach a boil.
b) The boiling point of water will increase.
c) The boiling point of water will decrease.
d) The boiling point of water will stay the same.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is - yes, 4.57 g of solute per 100 ml of solution
Explanation:
The correct answer is yes we can calculate the solubility of X in the water at 22.0°C. The salt will remain after the evaporate from the dissolved and cooled down at 26°C.
Then, the amount of solute dissolved in the 700 ml solution at 26°C is the weighed precipitate: 0.032 kg = 32 g.
Then solublity will be :
32. g solute / 700 ml solution = y / 100 ml solution
⇒ y = 32. g solute × 100 ml solution / 700 ml solution = 4.57 g.
Thus, the answer is 4.57 g of solute per 100 ml of solution.
Answer:The process of science is iterative.
Science circles back on itself so that useful ideas are built upon and used to learn even more about the natural world. This often means that successive investigations of a topic lead back to the same question, but at deeper and deeper levels. Let's begin with the basic question of how biological inheritance works. In the mid-1800s, Gregor Mendel showed that inheritance is particulate — that information is passed along in discrete packets that cannot be diluted. In the early 1900s, Walter Sutton and Theodor Boveri (among others) helped show that those particles of inheritance, today known as genes, were located on chromosomes. Experiments by Frederick Griffith, Oswald Avery, and many others soon elaborated on this understanding by showing that it was the DNA in chromosomes which carries genetic information. And then in 1953, James Watson and Francis Crick, again aided by the work of many others, provided an even more detailed understanding of inheritance by outlining the molecular structure of DNA. Still later in the 1960s, Marshall Nirenberg, Heinrich Matthaei, and others built upon this work to unravel the molecular code that allows DNA to encode proteins. And it doesn't stop there. Biologists have continued to deepen and extend our understanding of genes, how they are controlled, how patterns of control themselves are inherited, and how they produce the physical traits that pass from generation to generation. The process of science is not predetermined.
Any point in the process leads to many possible next steps, and where that next step leads could be a surprise. For example, instead of leading to a conclusion about tectonic movement, testing an idea about plate tectonics could lead to an observation of an unexpected rock layer. And that rock layer could trigger an interest in marine extinctions, which could spark a question about the dinosaur extinction — which might take the investigator off in an entirely new direction. At first this process might seem overwhelming. Even within the scope of a single investigation, science may involve many different people engaged in all sorts of different activities in different orders and at different points in time — it is simply much more dynamic, flexible, unpredictable, and rich than many textbooks represent it as. But don't panic! The scientific process may be complex, but the details are less important than the big picture …
Answer:
the correct option is B
Explanation:
The correct option is b, since if we reach pH 7, it means that the acid-base reaction is neutralized, therefore the base has been neutralized by an acid or vice versa, without taking into account the proteins or the amounts of both components .
