θ = angle of the incline surface from the horizontal surface = 25⁰
μ = Coefficient of friction = 0.15
m = mass of the person = 65 kg
= kinetic frictional force acting on the person as he slides down
mg = weight of the person acting in down direction
= normal force by the incline surface on the person
the free body diagram showing the forces acting on the person is given as
Answer:
The value of the angle is ![\bf{ \sin^{-1}[h/am_{e}v]}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%7B%20%5Csin%5E%7B-1%7D%5Bh%2Fam_%7Be%7Dv%5D%7D)
.
Explanation:
Given:
The condition for diffraction minima is
where, 
is the slit-width, 
is the angle of incidence, 
is the order number and 
is the wavelength of the light.
The wavelength of an electron traveling through a medium is governed by de Broglie's hypothesis.
According to de Broglie's hypothesis
Here, 
is Planck's constant, 
is the mass of the electron and 
is the velocity of the electron.
For first minimum 
.
From equation (1), we have
![&& a \sin \theta = \dfrac{h}{m_{e}v}\\&or,& \theta = \sin^{-1}[\dfrac{h}{am_{e}v}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%26%26%20a%20%5Csin%20%5Ctheta%20%3D%20%5Cdfrac%7Bh%7D%7Bm_%7Be%7Dv%7D%5C%5C%26or%2C%26%20%5Ctheta%20%3D%20%5Csin%5E%7B-1%7D%5B%5Cdfrac%7Bh%7D%7Bam_%7Be%7Dv%7D%5D)
Answer:
a. It is constant the whole time the ball is in free-fall
Explanation:
If we divide the movement on its vertical and horizontal components, and we concentrate on the vertical component, let's call x-component, and analyze Newton's second's law:
with 
, 
the acceleration on horizontal direction and m the mass of the ball, because the only force acting on the object is gravity that is always vertical, there're not forces on the horizontal direction that means 
and by (1) that implies =0 there's not acceleration on horizontal direction.
Because acceleration is the rate at what velocity changes and there's no acceleration, there's no change in velocity, in other words velocity is constant on horizontal direction.
Answer:
Hey there!
This is false. A qualitative study is about how a thing looks, not based on any mathematical or scientific data. Quantitative studies, on the other hand, draw conclusions.
Let me know if this helps :)
<span>First, a problem would be the sheer amount of wind resistance. If an object travels as far as even just one hundred miles it could encounter different wind patterns that could change the trajectory of the object. Second would be the size of the projectile. This creates a problem because the bigger it is, the more momentum it could potentially pick up, given that it is not too big to complete the distance. This is another problem with size, how far the projectile can actually travel. You would have to actually calculate the ideal size of said object to make sure it could actually make the distance you're looking for. hope it helps:)</span>
