1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
2 years ago
6

According to the big bang theory, which statement is accurate about how the universe came to be?

Chemistry
2 answers:
Drupady [299]2 years ago
5 0
Well there are 4 components of the Big Bang theory:

The first is that the universe is constantly expanding. When the Big Bang happened it started as a small, condensed, ball of Hydrogen that was smaller than a pinhead. This means that when it exploded it started expanding rapidly. In 1912, Slipher figured out that everything was moving away from us by measuring distances, but he thought it was all in the Milky Way Galaxy. In 1942, however, Hubble figured out that it wasn’t just the Milky Way Galaxy. He figured out that everything in the UNIVERSE was moving away, not just things in the Milky Way Galaxy. This started more interest in the theory. They found out that nothing was more than 13. 8 billion years old, therefore making the whole universe 13.8 billion years old. This made everyone realize that the whole universe started 13.8 billion years ago, or the Big Bang.

The second is that all of the elements in the universe are in the same ratio everywhere. What this means is that in every single point in the universe has the same exact amount of elements, which are Hydrogen and Helium. Due to this, scientists believe that the tiny ball, smaller than a pinhead, was heavily compressed star that exploded. This star was no ordinary star. This was more heavily compacted than any black hole there is. There was no other elements besides Hydrogen. So, when the “star” exploded the heat and pressure of the explosion was enough to create a universe after it cooled down.

The third is that the Big Bang created cosmic radiation. Light is a wave. For the light to change to microwaves it needed a catalyst which was the explosion. When it exploded the light waves expanded so much they became a new type of wave, a microwave. Think about it like this. Imagine you have a 6 foot wave at the beach. Then a mountain falls on the water creating a mile high beach wave. When the “star” exploded it was like a trillion mountains fell on itself creating a big enough ripple to turn light waves into microwaves. But the wave doesn’t just happen immediately. It would probably take at least a minute for the wave to get that high. When the Big Bang happened, it took a long time for the light waves to turn into microwaves. Which is why the Big Bang happened because like it said earlier it takes along time to make microwaves so 13.8 billion years is plenty of time to make microwaves.

The fourth is that gravity created the universe. When the Big Bang happened everything expanded outward. When the universe cooled itself after 10,000 years, gravity became the dominant force and pulled everything back together to create galaxies, stars, planets, etc. Because everything had exploded outward in the Big Bang, we see these objects throughout the universe. If the Big Bang had not happened, everything would still be tightly compressed together. Think about it like this. When dynomite goes off it sends everything around it back. That is not what happened with the Big Bang. There was nothing there to send it back. To better understand it think about a bread dough with chocolate chips inside. It starts as one thing and when heat is added it expands and everything in it expands away from one another. Like when the Big Bang happened, all of the things tightly compacted together expanded like the rising of the bread.

So to answer your question: The answer is complicated. Technically it could be C, however, I think the answer they are looking for is A because that is the only one that happened immediately.
Vlad1618 [11]2 years ago
4 0

stars and galaxies were formed

You might be interested in
Two methods can be used to determine the rate law for a reaction. One is a graphical method used to determine the integrated rat
zloy xaker [14]

Answer:

Initial rate method

Explanation:

The initial rate of the reaction is dictated by the different concentrations of one reactant, while other reactants remain constant.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the molecular formula of an empirical N2H3 if n=2? <br><br>SHOW WORK!
aliya0001 [1]

A compound's empirical formula tells you what the smallest whole number ratio between the atoms that make up that compound is.

I think of the empirical formula as a building block for molecules. A compound's molecular formula will depend on how many building blocks are needed to build a molecule of a given substance.

In your example, you know that the empirical formula of the compound is

NO

2

.

This tells you that the minimum ratio between nitrogen atoms and oxygen atoms is

1

:

2

. In other words, the molecular formula will be a multiple of this building block.

molecular formula

=

empirical formula

×

n

, where

n

- the number of building blocks needed to build the molecular formula.

You also know that the molar mass of your compound is

92 g/mol

.

This means that the molar mass of all the atoms that make up that molecule must add up to give

92 g/mol

.

So, how would you determine how many building blocks you need? Well, start by figuring out the molar mass of one building block, i.e. the molar mass of the empirical formula.

Since it contains one nitrogen atom and two oxygen atoms, you will get

1

×

14.0067 g/mol

+

2

×

15.9994 g/mol

=

46.0055 g/mol

So, if one building block has a molar mass of

46.0055 g/mol

, how many would you need to get the molecule?

46.0055 g/mol

⋅

n

=

92 g/mol

n

=

92

g/mol

46.0055

g/mol

=

1.99976

≈

2

This means that the compound's molecular formula, which lists all the atoms that make up a molecule, will be

(

NO

2

)

×

2

=

N

2

O

4

→

dinitrogen tetroxide

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the pH of a 0.0042 M hydrochloric acid solution?
babymother [125]

Answer:

E) 2.38

Explanation:

The pH of any solution , helps to determine the acidic strength of the solution ,

i.e. ,

  • Lower the value of pH , higher is its acidic strength

and ,

  • Higher the value of pH , lower is its acidic strength .

pH is given as the negative log of the concentration of H⁺ ions ,

hence ,

pH = - log H⁺

From the question ,

the concentration of the solution is 0.0042 M , and being it a strong acid , dissociates completely to its respective ions ,

Therefore , the concentration of H⁺ = 0.0042 M .

Hence , using the above equation , the value of pH can be calculated as follows -

pH = - log H⁺

pH = - log ( 0.0042 M )

pH =  2.38 .

4 0
3 years ago
How many grams are in 2.3 x 10-4 moles of calcium phosphate,<br> Ca3(PO3)2?
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

7136900g or 7136 kg

 

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Why are leaves different colors?
Marina86 [1]
<span>Why are leaves different colors?</span><span>
The chlorophyll breaks down</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What type of intermolecular forces exist between br2 and ccl4?
    11·1 answer
  • #8 please explain if you can<br> thanks
    10·1 answer
  • How many molecules of lactate can one molecule of lactate dehydrogenase act on in 21 minutes?
    5·1 answer
  • Because metallic bonds permit one plane of ions to slide past another without breaking bonds, metals are:_______
    7·1 answer
  • Gina wants to use models to better understand how the types of bonds in a molecule relate to the presence of geometric isomers.
    13·2 answers
  • True or false?<br><br> To decrease the concentration of a<br> solution, add more liquid.
    13·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE!!!<br><br>How are both stability and change seen in properties of elements? ​
    7·1 answer
  • Are the electron geometries of water and ammonia similar?
    10·1 answer
  • What happens in nuclear fission reactions?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the empirical formula of a carbon-oxygen compound, given that a 95.2 g sample of the compound contains 40.8 g of carbon
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!