All categories

2 years ago

Tabitha knows the redshift value of a particular celestial object. What can she use this information most directly to find out?

Physics

1 answer:

AlekseyPX2 years ago

3 0

She can use the information of redshift of a celestial body is to find the age and distance of the object.

<h3>What is red shift?</h3>

'Red shift' is a critical idea for astronomers. The frequency of the light is increased, so the light is observed as moving towards the red side of the range.

Tabitha knows the redshift value of a particular celestial object. She uses this information to observe the consequence of the redshift.

Thus, the red shift value is used to determine the age and distance of the object.

Learn more about red shift.

brainly.com/question/5368237

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

A coffee filter of mass 1.2 grams dropped from a height of 1 m reaches the ground with a speed of 0.8 m/s. How much kinetic ener

iren [92.7K]

<u>Answer:</u> The energy gained by the air molecules is 0.011 J.

<u>Explanation:</u>

Law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed but it can only be transformed from one form to another form.

Here, the potential energy of the coffee filter is getting converted into kinetic energy of the coffee filter and some energy is lost by it which is gained by the air molecules in the form of kinetic energy.

So, calculating the potential energy of coffee filter, we use the equation:

P = mgh

where,

m = mass of coffee filter = 1.2 g = $1.2\times 10^{-3}kg$ (Conversion used: 1 kg = 1000 g)

g = acceleration due to gravity = $9.8m/s^2$

h = height of coffee filter = 1 m

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$P=1.2\times 10^{-3}kg\times 9.8m/s^2\times 1m\\\\P=1.176\times 10^{-2}J$

Calculating the kinetic energy of coffee filter, we use the equation:

$E=\frac{1}{2}mv^2$

where,

m = mass of coffee filter = 1.2 g = $1.2\times 10^{-3}kg$

v = speed of coffee filter = 0.8 m/s

Putting values in above equation, we get:

$E=\frac{1}{2}\times 1.2\times 10^{-3}kg\times (0.8m/s)^2\\\\E=3.84\times 10^{-4}J$

As, energy lost by coffee filter = energy gained by air molecules

So, energy lost by coffee filter = Potential energy - Kinetic energy

Energy lost by coffee filter = $(1.176\times 10^{-2})-(3.84\times 10^{-4})=0.011J$

Hence, the energy gained by the air molecules is 0.011 J.

5 0

3 years ago

How can we use thermal energy to our advantage?

devlian [24]

Answer:

One of the primary advantages of thermal power is that the generation costs are extremely low. No fuel is needed to generate the power, and the minimal energy needed to pump water to the Earth's surface can be taken from the total energy yield.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Ann is driving down a street at 61 km/h.

Wittaler [7]

Answer:

12.267 seconds approximately.

Explanation:

The units can be simplified into m/s, in which case you would have 61000/3600. Simplify that to 16 and 17/18. This is your meters per second, so multiply that by .724 to get the answer.

4 0

3 years ago

8.92 x 10 ^ 6 (convert from scientific notation to a standard aka regular number)

n200080 [17]

The answer is 8,920,000

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Wave-particle duality tells us that wave and particle models apply to all objects whatever the size, so why don't we observe wav

Genrish500 [490]

Answer:

Because the wavelengths of macroscopic objects are too short for them to be detectable.

Explanation:

Wavelength of an object is given by de Broglie wavelength as:

$\lambda=\frac{h}{mv}$

Where, 'h' is Planck's constant, 'm' is mass of object and 'v' is its velocity.

So, for macroscopic objects, the mass is very large compared to microscopic objects. As we can observe from the above formula, there is an inverse relationship between the mass and wavelength of the object.

So, for vary larger masses, the wavelength would be too short and one will find it undetectable. Therefore, we don't observe wave properties in macroscopic objects.

4 0

3 years ago