Galileo only saw the system through a scope
<span>Answer: The acceleration of 10 kg object is greater than that of 18 kg object.
Explanation:
According to Newton's Second law:
F = ma --- (A)
Let's find the acceleration for both 10 kg and 18 kg objects!
The net force on both of these masses = F = 20N
(1) Acceleration of 10 kg object
Mass = m = 10 kg
Plug in the values in equation (A):
20 = 10 * a
Acceleration = a = 2 m/s^2
(2) Acceleration of 18 kg object
Mass = m = 18 kg
Plug in the values in equation (A):
20 = 18 * a
Acceleration = a = 1.11 m/s^2
2 > 1.11; therefore, 10 kg object has the higher acceleration compared to the acceleration of the 18 kg object.</span>
Answer:
E = k Q / [d(d+L)]
Explanation:
As the charge distribution is continuous we must use integrals to solve the problem, using the equation of the elective field
E = k ∫ dq/ r² r^
"k" is the Coulomb constant 8.9875 10 9 N / m2 C2, "r" is the distance from the load to the calculation point, "dq" is the charge element and "r^" is a unit ventor from the load element to the point.
Suppose the rod is along the x-axis, let's look for the charge density per unit length, which is constant
λ = Q / L
If we derive from the length we have
λ = dq/dx ⇒ dq = L dx
We have the variation of the cgarge per unit length, now let's calculate the magnitude of the electric field produced by this small segment of charge
dE = k dq / x²2
dE = k λ dx / x²
Let us write the integral limits, the lower is the distance from the point to the nearest end of the rod "d" and the upper is this value plus the length of the rod "del" since with these limits we have all the chosen charge consider
E = k 
We take out the constant magnitudes and perform the integral
E = k λ (-1/x)
Evaluating
E = k λ [ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)]
Using λ = Q/L
E = k Q/L [ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)]
let's use a bit of arithmetic to simplify the expression
[ 1/d - 1/ (d+L)] = L /[d(d+L)]
The final result is
E = k Q / [d(d+L)]
Answer:
(a) the electrical power generated for still summer day is 1013.032 W
(b)the electrical power generated for a breezy winter day is 1270.763 W
Explanation:
Given;
Area of panel = 2 m × 4 m, = 8m²
solar flux GS = 700 W/m²
absorptivity of the panel, αS = 0.83
efficiency of conversion, η = P/αSGSA = 0.553 − 0.001 K⁻¹ Tp
panel emissivity , ε = 0.90
Apply energy balance equation to determine he electrical power generated;
transferred energy + generated energy = 0
(radiation + convection) + generated energy = 0
![[\alpha_sG_s-\epsilon \alpha(T_p^4-T_s^4)]-h(T_p-T_\infty) - \eta \alpha_s G_s = 0](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Calpha_sG_s-%5Cepsilon%20%5Calpha%28T_p%5E4-T_s%5E4%29%5D-h%28T_p-T_%5Cinfty%29%20-%20%5Ceta%20%5Calpha_s%20G_s%20%3D%200)
![[\alpha_sG_s-\epsilon \alpha(T_p^4-T_s^4)]-h(T_p-T_\infty) - (0.553-0.001T_p)\alpha_s G_s](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5Calpha_sG_s-%5Cepsilon%20%5Calpha%28T_p%5E4-T_s%5E4%29%5D-h%28T_p-T_%5Cinfty%29%20-%20%280.553-0.001T_p%29%5Calpha_s%20G_s)
(a) the electrical power generated for still summer day

![[0.83*700-0.9*5.67*10^{-8}(T_p_1^4-308^4)]-10(T_p_1-308) - (0.553-0.001T_p_1)0.83*700 = 0\\\\3798.94-5.103*10^{-8}T_p_1^4 - 9.419T_p_1 = 0\\\\Apply \ \ iteration \ method \ to \ solve \ for \ T_p_1\\\\T_p_1 = 335.05 \ k](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B0.83%2A700-0.9%2A5.67%2A10%5E%7B-8%7D%28T_p_1%5E4-308%5E4%29%5D-10%28T_p_1-308%29%20-%20%280.553-0.001T_p_1%290.83%2A700%20%3D%200%5C%5C%5C%5C3798.94-5.103%2A10%5E%7B-8%7DT_p_1%5E4%20-%209.419T_p_1%20%3D%200%5C%5C%5C%5CApply%20%5C%20%20%5C%20iteration%20%5C%20method%20%5C%20to%20%5C%20solve%20%5C%20for%20%5C%20T_p_1%5C%5C%5C%5CT_p_1%20%3D%20335.05%20%5C%20k)

(b)the electrical power generated for a breezy winter day

![[0.83*700-0.9*5.67*10^{-8}(T_p_2^4-258^4)]-10(T_p_2-258) - (0.553-0.001T_p_2)0.83*700 = 0\\\\8225.81-5.103*10^{-8}T_p_2^4 - 29.419T_p_2 = 0\\\\Apply \ \ iteration \ method \ to \ solve \ for \ T_p_2\\\\T_p_2 = 279.6 \ k](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B0.83%2A700-0.9%2A5.67%2A10%5E%7B-8%7D%28T_p_2%5E4-258%5E4%29%5D-10%28T_p_2-258%29%20-%20%280.553-0.001T_p_2%290.83%2A700%20%3D%200%5C%5C%5C%5C8225.81-5.103%2A10%5E%7B-8%7DT_p_2%5E4%20-%2029.419T_p_2%20%3D%200%5C%5C%5C%5CApply%20%5C%20%20%5C%20iteration%20%5C%20method%20%5C%20to%20%5C%20solve%20%5C%20for%20%5C%20T_p_2%5C%5C%5C%5CT_p_2%20%3D%20279.6%20%5C%20k)
