1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Morgarella [4.7K]
1 year ago
8

What is the constant of variation for the following table? If your answer is in the form of a fraction, write your answer in as

a/b.
(where a is the numerator and b is the denominator)

Mathematics
1 answer:
nikklg [1K]1 year ago
8 0

Answer:

1/4

Step-by-step explanation:

Change is y (f9x) over the change in x.

Look at the f(x) column.

What is the change from -2 to -1?  1

What is the change from -1 to 0? 1

What is the change from 0 to 1? 1

What is the change from 1 to 2? 1

We see that this change is constant.  It is always 1.

Look at the x column.

What is the change from -8 to -4? 4

What is the change from -4 to 0? 4

What is the change from 0 to 4? 4

What is the change from 4 to 8? 4

We see that the change is constant.  It is always 1.

When we put this change the form a/b we get 1/4

You might be interested in
Tom baked 14 cookies with 2 scoops of flour with 11 scoops of flour how many cookies can tom bake
vodomira [7]

Answer:77

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
How do you get from 24 to a hundred
Tasya [4]
The easiest way would be adding 76
7 0
2 years ago
Proportional relationships, please answer all of the parts! Thank you!
Natalka [10]

Answer:

a. No (see below)

b. (see below)

c. Johnny

d. Johnny = $12.50 / hour      Doug = $9.16... / hour

e. Doug: extend the table to show how much he gets paid for 1 hour of work (the unit rate)

Johnny: already on the graph

Step-by-step explanation:

a. No. This is because a proportional relationship would have a certain ratio between payment and the amount of time spent working, which would not change. However, if Doug's neighbour pays him $55 for 6 hours, it's likely that this is not a proportional relationship, or we would be able to divide $55 by the 6 hours Doug spent working.

b. Even though above I said that it's probably not a proportional relationship, if it were, we would have to divide everything equally. I'm guessing the table should look like this:

                            Doug

       Time (hr)                      Earnings ($)

          4                                  $36.66...

          5                                  $45.8333...

          6                                  $55

          7                                  $64.4666....

          8                                  $73.333...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 4 hours:

4/6 x $55 = 2/3 x $55 = $36.66... (so definitely not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 5 hours:

5/6 x $55 = $45.8333.... (more evidence that this is not a proportional relationship)

To work out how much Doug would get for working 7 hours (we already got 6 hours):

7/6 x $55 = $64.4666...

To work out how much Doug would get for working 8 hours:

8/6 x $55 = $73.33... (we could double the 4 hour payment, but this is probably more accurate)

c. Johnny is getting paid more. If we look at how much Doug gets for 6 hours, it's $55. If we look out at how much Johnny gets for 6 hours, it's $75. (If we do the same with the other amounts of time, it's the same.

4 hours: D = $36.67 vs J = $50

5 hours: D = $45.83 VS J = $60

etc...

d. Johnny gets $75 per 6 hours --> 75/6 = $12.50 per hour

Doug gets $55 per 6 hours --> 55/6 = $9.1666... per hour

e. Carry on the table for Doug all the way to 1, so you can see the how much Doug gets paid for 1 hour of work (i.e. the minimum).

The unit rate is already on the graph for Johnny.

HOPE THIS HELPED :)

P.S. Mate cld you please give me Brainliest? That table took so much dam work

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(English to algebra) twice the difference of w less than five
denpristay [2]

i believe its 2(5-w)

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Use the distributive property to create an equivalent expression to the equation 9(2j + 5j).
frez [133]

Answer:

63 Hope this helps you and everyone else :)

Step-by-step explanation:

First, multiply 9x2 to get 18. Then, multiply 9x5 to get 45. Finally add both numbers to get 63.

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Nancy wrote the greatest number that can be made using each of these digits exactly once. 5,3,4,9,8,1. Part A what was Nancy's n
    13·2 answers
  • What is 65,754.59 rounded to the nearest tenth
    8·2 answers
  • 14t-8=6t solve this equation
    9·2 answers
  • I buy 6 CD,s casting £ 6.99 each how much change do I get from £ 50<br><br><br> plz answer
    15·1 answer
  • 10a^2b^0 for a=–3, b=–8
    10·2 answers
  • A box of oranges weighs 4 kg. if one orange weighs 80 g how many oranges are in the box​
    9·1 answer
  • PLEASEEEEEE HELPPPPP ASAPPPPP
    6·2 answers
  • Help plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz​
    15·1 answer
  • Find the value of x,y, and z. Simplify the radical
    8·1 answer
  • If the volume of a cone is 10 m^3 what is its height if the area of the base is 10 m^2?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!