All categories

1 year ago

Which best explains the forces acting on the objects?

1 answer:

5 0

The option that best explains the forces acting on the objects is that option b. Objects W and Y have balanced forces, and objects X and Z have unbalanced forces.

<h3>How do you know if forces are balanced or unbalanced?</h3>

When the motion of an object is said to be altered, the forces are known to be in a sate that is seen as unbalanced.

Note that Balanced forces are said to be one that are equal in size and also opposite in direction.

Hence, if forces are balanced, there is no alteration in motion and it is seen in cases if a person is pushed or pulled on an object that is seen from opposite directions but also has the same force.

Therefore, The option that best talks about the forces acting on the objects is that option b. Objects W and Y have balanced forces, and objects X and Z have unbalanced forces as it does better justice to it.

Learn more about forces from

brainly.com/question/4289010

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

What do we call a change in the car’s speed or direction? Help!!

zhuklara [117]

The answer for this question is acceleration

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What movements of water has the greatest effect on the growth of producers

kolbaska11 [484]

The movement of water that has the greatest effect on the growth of producers is upwelling.

Upwelling is a rising of a liquid. The reason upwelling is much better for producers is because it is a slow rising in the water level, preventing erosion to the topsoil and still giving the necessary amount of water and nutrients the producers need.

Thank you for your question! I hope this helped! Have an amazing day and feel free to let me know if you need any more help with anything :D

5 0

2 years ago

What is the most likely reason that Mendeleev placed tellurium before iodine?

Ilya [14]

Mendeleev watched that tellurium has compound properties like different components in its gathering, and he didn't realize that neutrons cause the more noteworthy nuclear mass. Mendeleev expressed that he anticipated that tellurium would have a lower nuclear mass than iodine.

8 0

2 years ago

Alonzo sprints for 500 meters along a straight track during a race. After crossing the finish line, he to walks back along the t

Nata [24]

450 meters, straight ahead is the answer.

6 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A torque of 36.5 N · m is applied to an initially motionless wheel which rotates around a fixed axis. This torque is the result

vivado [14]

Answer:

$21.6\ \text{kg m}^2$

$3.672\ \text{Nm}$

$54.66\ \text{revolutions}$

Explanation:

$\tau$ = Torque = 36.5 Nm

$\omega_i$ = Initial angular velocity = 0

$\omega_f$ = Final angular velocity = 10.3 rad/s

t = Time = 6.1 s

I = Moment of inertia

From the kinematic equations of linear motion we have

$\omega_f=\omega_i+\alpha_1 t\\\Rightarrow \alpha_1=\dfrac{\omega_f-\omega_i}{t}\\\Rightarrow \alpha_1=\dfrac{10.3-0}{6.1}\\\Rightarrow \alpha_1=1.69\ \text{rad/s}^2$

Torque is given by

$\tau=I\alpha_1\\\Rightarrow I=\dfrac{\tau}{\alpha_1}\\\Rightarrow I=\dfrac{36.5}{1.69}\\\Rightarrow I=21.6\ \text{kg m}^2$

The wheel's moment of inertia is $21.6\ \text{kg m}^2$

t = 60.6 s

$\omega_i$ = 10.3 rad/s

$\omega_f$ = 0

$\alpha_2=\dfrac{0-10.3}{60.6}\\\Rightarrow \alpha_1=-0.17\ \text{rad/s}^2$

Frictional torque is given by

$\tau_f=I\alpha_2\\\Rightarrow \tau_f=21.6\times -0.17\\\Rightarrow \tau=-3.672\ \text{Nm}$

The magnitude of the torque caused by friction is $3.672\ \text{Nm}$

Speeding up

$\theta_1=0\times t+\dfrac{1}{2}\times 1.69\times 6.1^2\\\Rightarrow \theta_1=31.44\ \text{rad}$

Slowing down

$\theta_2=10.3\times 60.6+\dfrac{1}{2}\times (-0.17)\times 60.6^2\\\Rightarrow \theta_2=312.03\ \text{rad}$

Total number of revolutions

$\theta=\theta_1+\theta_2\\\Rightarrow \theta=31.44+312.03=343.47\ \text{rad}$

$\dfrac{343.47}{2\pi}=54.66\ \text{revolutions}$

The total number of revolutions the wheel goes through is $54.66\ \text{revolutions}$ .

3 0

2 years ago