An investigation that has been done by more than one scientist with similar findings has been What?

Physics

1 answer:

yarga [219]2 years ago

5 0

An investigation that has been done by more than one scientist with similar findings has been replicated.

<h3>What does replication in science mean?</h3>

The expression 'replication in science' makes reference to the same experimental result through different hypothesis testing procedures, which is fundamental to reinforcing a scientific idea.

In conclusion, an investigation that has been done by more than one scientist with similar findings has been replicated.

Learn more about replication in science here:

brainly.com/question/24382552

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

The resistivity of gold is 2.44 × 10-8 Ω · m at room temperature. A gold wire that is 1.8 mm in diameter and 11 cm long carries

tester [92]

Power in a wire where current is flowing can be calculated from the product of the square of the current and the resistance. Resistance is equal to the product of resistivity and length divided by the area of the wire. We do as follows:

Resistance = 2.44 × 10-8 ( 0.11) / (π)(0.0009)^2 = 1.055x10^-3 <span>Ω

P = I^2R = .170^2 (</span>1.055x10^-3 ) = 3.048x10^-5 W

6 0

3 years ago

Which one has greater potential energy? An 8 kg rock sitting on a 2.2 m cliff or a 6 kg rock sitting on a 3.2 m cliff.

Evgesh-ka [11]

Answer: The 6 kg rock sitting on a 3.2 m cliff.

Explanation:

The potential energy of an object of mass M that is at a height H above the ground us:

U = M*H*g

where g is the gravitational acceleration:

g = 9.8m/s^2

Then:

"An 8 kg rock sitting on a 2.2 m cliff"

M = 8kg

H = 2.2m

U = 8kg*2.2m*9.8 m/s^2 = 172.48 J

"a 6 kg rock sitting on a 3.2 m cliff"

M = 6kg

H = 3.2m

U = 6kg*3.2m*9.8m/s^2 = 188.16 J

You can see that the 6kg rock on a 3.2m cliff has a larger potential energy.

6 0

3 years ago

Which of these energy transformations is not part of how a nuclear power plant

frutty [35]

I think the second one

7 0

3 years ago

The curve below shows the percentage of population of aquatic species that die in response to doses of pollutant A:

Elis [28]

Based on the trend produced by the dose - response graph, it would be best to evacuate the residents in other to prevent the increasing percentage of deaths due to the rising level of pollutant A.

The curve shows that the pollutant level in mg/kg of pollutant A is still increasing, hence, groundwater monitoring alone won't be the best decision to make.