Answer:
s = 1.7 m
Explanation:
from the question we are given the following:
Mass of package (m) = 5 kg
mass of the asteriod (M) = 7.6 x 10^{20} kg
radius = 8 x 10^5 m
velocity of package (v) = 170 m/s
spring constant (k) = 2.8 N/m
compression (s) = ?
Assuming that no non conservative force is acting on the system here, the initial and final energies of the system will be the same. Therefore
• Ei = Ef
• Ei = energy in the spring + gravitational potential energy of the system
• Ei = \frac{1}{2}ks^{2} + \frac{GMm}{r}
• Ef = kinetic energy of the object
• Ef = \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
• \frac{1}{2}ks^{2} + (-\frac{GMm}{r}) = \frac{1}{2}mv^{2}
• s = 
s = 
s = 1.7 m
The correct answer of this question is : A) Change alternating current into direct current.
EXPLANATION :
As per the question, we are given vacuum tube. Vacuum tube can be of various types. Normally it contains two electrodes called cathode and anode which are enclosed in an evacuated glass chamber . There are also other types of vacuum tubes which contain extra electrodes like control grid .
The vacuum tube can be used as a rectifier. It means that it can be used as an electronic device which will convert alternating current into direct current. It may be a half wave rectifier or a full wave rectifier. Actually the direct current obtained during the rectification of alternating current is pulsating in nature.
Hence, the correct answer is that a vacuum tube can be used to change alternating current into direct current.
Answer: A wave with a frequency of 14 Hz has a wavelength of 3 meters. At what speed will this wave travel? 1. = 3m (4. = 42m. 2. ... 1,7m (46) = 7802 m. 4. A wave traveling at 230 m/sec has a wavelength of 2.1 meters. What is the frequency of.
Explanation: please give me brainlest
Answer:
Option C is the untrue statement.
Answer:
The results have not been through the rigorous process of peer review
Explanation:
When a scientist conducts a study and obtains results, those results ought to be submitted to a reputable journal where the results would go through the rigorous protocol of peer review.
During this process, the reliability of the data presented is ascertained before the results are published for other scientists to see.
If the results are hurriedly published on the internet, many researchers who come in contact with the work may be fed with inaccurate information.
