I think its true, I think.
Answer:
The answer is "effective stress at point B is 7382 ksi
"
Explanation:
Calculating the value of Compressive Axial Stress:
![\to \sigma y =\frac{F}{A} = \frac{4 F}{( p d ^2 )} = \frac{(4 x ( - 40000 \ lbf))}{[ p \times (1 \ in)^2 ]} = - 50.9 \ ksi \\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cto%20%5Csigma%20y%20%20%3D%5Cfrac%7BF%7D%7BA%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B4%20F%7D%7B%28%20p%20d%20%5E2%20%29%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%284%20x%20%28%20-%2040000%20%5C%20lbf%29%29%7D%7B%5B%20p%20%5Ctimes%20%281%20%5C%20in%29%5E2%20%5D%7D%20%3D%20-%2050.9%20%5C%20ksi%20%5C%5C)
Calculating Shear Transverse:



![\to \sigma' =[ s y^2 +3( t \times y^2 + t yz^2 )] \times \frac{1}{2}\\\\](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cto%20%5Csigma%27%20%3D%5B%20s%20y%5E2%20%2B3%28%20t%20%5Ctimes%20y%5E2%20%2B%20t%20yz%5E2%20%29%5D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C)
![= [ (-50.9)^2 +3((63.7)^2 +(0.17)^2 )] \times \frac{1}{2}\\\\=[2590.81+ 3(4057.69)+0.0289]\times \frac{1}{2}\\\\=[2590.81+12,173.07+0.0289] \times \frac{1}{2}\\\\=14763.9089\times \frac{1}{2}\\\\ = 7381.95445 \ ksi\\\\ = 7382 \ ksi](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%20%5B%20%28-50.9%29%5E2%20%2B3%28%2863.7%29%5E2%20%2B%280.17%29%5E2%20%29%5D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B2590.81%2B%203%284057.69%29%2B0.0289%5D%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5B2590.81%2B12%2C173.07%2B0.0289%5D%20%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D14763.9089%5Ctimes%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%3D%207381.95445%20%5C%20ksi%5C%5C%5C%5C%20%3D%207382%20%5C%20ksi)
Since the object is dropped from some height so its initial speed must be zero
acceleration of the object is due to gravity
so we can use kinematics to find the time it will take to drop by x = 22 m



Now the speed after 2.12 s will be given as



so above is the speed and time
The electrons stop flowing
The magnitude of the electric field for 60 cm is 6.49 × 10^5 N/C
R(radius of the solid sphere)=(60cm)( 1m /100cm)=0.6m

Since the Gaussian sphere of radius r>R encloses all the charge of the sphere similar to the situation in part (c), we can use Equation (6) to find the magnitude of the electric field:

Substitute numerical values:

The spherical Gaussian surface is chosen so that it is concentric with the charge distribution.
As an example, consider a charged spherical shell S of negligible thickness, with a uniformly distributed charge Q and radius R. We can use Gauss's law to find the magnitude of the resultant electric field E at a distance r from the center of the charged shell. It is immediately apparent that for a spherical Gaussian surface of radius r < R the enclosed charge is zero: hence the net flux is zero and the magnitude of the electric field on the Gaussian surface is also 0 (by letting QA = 0 in Gauss's law, where QA is the charge enclosed by the Gaussian surface).
Learn more about Gaussian sphere here:
brainly.com/question/2004529
#SPJ4