All categories

1 year ago

What is the expected ratio of free-hanging earlobes to attached earlobes in the offspring

Physics

1 answer:

boyakko [2]1 year ago

4 0

The expected ratio of free-hanging earlobes to attached earlobes in the offspring is 1:2.

<h3>How to illustrate the ratio?</h3>

The diagram depicts a Punnett square used to predict the earlobe shape of two parents' offspring. The capital A represents free-hanging earlobes, while the lowercase a represents attached earlobes.

The Punnett square is a square diagram used to predict genotypes of a specific cross or breeding experiment. It is named after Reginald C. Punnett, who invented it in 1905. Biologists use the diagram to calculate the likelihood of an offspring having a specific genotype.

In this case, the genotype rato based on the attached diagram is 1:2.

Learn more about offspring on:

brainly.com/question/471576

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

How is Behaviorism and Psychoanalysis theories are different?

ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

Behaviorists give prominence to the external behavior of individuals and believe that behavior is a response to external stimuli. On the other hand, psychoanalysis emphasizes the centrality of the human mind. They believe that the unconscious has the potential to motivate behavior.

Explanation:

4 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If earth had no landmasses, then the idealized zonal precipitation pattern would have _______.

inysia [295]

If the planet earth has no land masses, the idealized zonal precipitation pattern would likely have regions that are wet in the equator and there will be more of mid-latitudes if the earth has no land masses at all and it does not exist.

7 0

4 years ago

Which three characteristics do mechanical waves and electrocmagnetic

almond37 [142]

B the waves transfer energy from its source

8 0

3 years ago

Salmon often jump waterfalls to reach their

Y_Kistochka [10]

Answer:

5.38 m/s

Explanation:

Given (in the x direction):

Δx = 2.45 m

v₀ = v cos 42.5°

a = 0 m/s²

Δx = v₀ t + ½ at²

(2.45 m) = (v cos 42.5°) t + ½ (0 m/s²) t²

2.45 = (v cos 42.5°) t

t = 3.32 / v

Given (in the y direction):

Δy = 0.373 m

v₀ = v sin 42.5°

a = -9.8 m/s²

Δx = v₀ t + ½ at²

(0.373 m) = (v sin 42.5°) t + ½ (-9.81 m/s²) t²

0.373 = (v sin 42.5°) t − 4.905 t²

0.373 = (v sin 42.5°) (3.32 / v) − 4.905 (3.32 / v)²

0.373 = 2.25 − 54.2 / v²

v = 5.38

Graph:

desmos.com/calculator/5n30oxqmuu

4 0

3 years ago

Work/Power problem with friction

Kisachek [45]

Answer:

This is the formula

Explanation:

−(0.54 m/s)2

2(−1.67 m/s2)

so this is the step by taking the mean of the maximum value of friction with the minimum value you can get the average force of friction

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers