Probably for kind of the same reason that speed is expressed as a
relationship between two units. You know, like miles per hour .
I guess the only reason is because no single unit has been invented
to describe density.
The rate of doing work or using energy would always be expressed
as a relationship between two units ... we would say that the rate of
work is "(so many) joules per second". But the "watt" was invented,
so we can say "(so many) watts" instead.
So I guess you're right. Density could be simpler to describe
if we only had a unit for it. Then we wouldn't have to say "(so many)
grams per cubic centimeter". We would just say "(so many) (new unit)".
Let's try it out:
"Uhhh, pardon me Professor . . . I've been working late in the lab,
and I believe I've identified a new substance, hitherto unknown to
the scientific community, and totally unexpected. In its pure form,
the substance appears to be pink, it smells like butterscotch, and
its density is approximately 27.4 Brianas. I think it's time we published
these findings ... with your name as lead investigator, of course."
I like it !
Answer:
Electrons are not little balls that can fall into the nucleus under electrostatic attraction
Explanation:
Hey There,
Question: "<span>A student gives a brief push to a block of dry ice. A moment later, the block moves across a very smooth surface at a constant speed. When drawing the free body diagram for the block of dry ice moving at a constant speed, the forces that should be included are: (select all that apply)"
Answer: C. Force Of Friction
B. Force
If This Helps May I Have Brainliest?</span>
Explanation:
6a) Work = force × distance
W = Fd
W = (60 N) (10 m)
W = 600 J
6b) Change in energy = work
ΔKE = 600 J
7a) Kinetic energy is half the mass times the square of the velocity.
KE = ½ mv²
KE = ½ (0.4 kg) (25 m/s)²
KE = 125 J
7b) Work = change in energy. When the ball is stopped, it has zero kinetic energy.
W = ΔKE
W = 0 J − 125 J
W = -125 J
This is true. let me know if im wrong.
