1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
13

Which of the following does NOT describe the conversion of potential to kinetic energy? Question 12 options:

Physics
1 answer:
Marianna [84]3 years ago
6 0

The option “The sum emitting light energy” does not describe the conversion of potential energy to kinetic energy.

Answer: Option A

<u>Explanation: </u>

The potential energy, the object's energy at rest while the kinetic energy is the energy the object in motion. So among the options given, a rocket leaving the Earth's atmosphere consists of conversion of potential energy as the thrusting force to kinetic energy of the movement of the rocket to space.

Similarly the stretching of rubber band is a form of elastic potential energy and when it is released, the band will vibrate which will be the converted kinetic energy.

Also, the avalanche is the falling of ice berg which were once in rest, so the potential energy of the ice berg will get converted to kinetic energy during avalanche.

The option that is the sun emitting light does not convert potential to kinetic energy, instead it converts potential to light energy.

You might be interested in
Why does the current splits in parallel circuit and why does the voltage remains equal?​
Xelga [282]

<u>Voltage:</u>

It is basically the difference between the charges of the materials on the ends of the Wire

<em>also known as potential difference</em>

It is very similar to the movement of air, it moves from higher density to lower density. in this case, the change in density is the potential difference

So, since voltage is the difference between the charge available on the ends of a wire. Even if the wire splits in parallel circuit, the difference of the charges remains the same

<em>the more the potential difference, the faster electrons will move to the material with lower charge</em>

<u>Current:</u>

Current is the amount of electrons moving through a cross-section of a wire in a period of time

So basically, it is the amount of electrons that move across a given point on a wire in a period of time

If the wire splits, we will have the same amount of electrons moving through as they would if the wire was not split but now, the electrons passing are divided and hence, if we measure the current after the split, we will find that we have a lower current

that's because we have less charge moving through the cross-section of the wire since some of those electrons are moving through a different wire

That's why the current splits in a parallel circuit

3 0
2 years ago
The frequency of a wave is 250hz. What is the period
antoniya [11.8K]

Answer:

Hope it helps for you :)))))

8 0
2 years ago
Please. Physics is so difficult.
Softa [21]

Answer:

0.010 m

Explanation:

So the equation for a pendulum period is: y=2\pi\sqrt{\frac{L}{g}} where L is the length of the pendulum. In this case I'll use the approximation of pi as 3.14, and g=9.8 m\s. So given that it oscillates once every 1.99 seconds. you have the equation:

1.99 s = 2(3.14)\sqrt{\frac{L}{9.8 m\backslash s^2}}\\

Evaluate the multiplication in front

1.99 s = 6.28\sqrt{\frac{L}{9.8m\backslash s^2}

Divide both sides by 6.28

0.317 s= \sqrt{\frac{L}{9.8 m\backslash s^2}}

Square both sides

0.100 s^2= \frac{L}{9.8 m\backslash s^2}

Multiply both sides by m/s^2  (the s^2 will cancel out)

0.984 m = L

Now now let's find the length when it's two seconds

2.00 s = 6.28\sqrt{\frac{L}{9.8m\backslash s^2}}

Divide both sides by 6.28

0.318 s = \sqrt{\frac{L}{9.8 m\backslash s^2}

Square both sides

0.101 s^2 = \frac{L}{9.8 m\backslash s^2}

Multiply both sides by 9.8 m/s^2 (s^2 will cancel out)

0.994 m = L

So to find the difference you simply subtract

0.984 - 0.994 = 0.010 m

4 0
1 year ago
Read 2 more answers
What is the net force on a car moving in a straight line with a constant velocity
guapka [62]

Answer:

For example, when a car travels at a constant speed, the driving force from the engine is balanced by resistive forces such as air resistance and friction in the car's moving parts. The resultant force on the car is zero.

Explanation:

hope this helps

3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please someone help me? if you have a good answer I will gave U a brainlest :)
Natali5045456 [20]

Answer:

for one its photo

Explanation: answers

this is easy 1. im not sure

2. erosion

3. is deposition

sorry i cant answer all of them but some simple ones deposition is when that stuff is getting moved, erosion is the breaking down of sokething and weathering is weather such as rain acid rain ice etc weather breeakin down rocks etc

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The earth is made mostly of metals and rocks. Where did this material come from? It was made by nuclear fission of uranium and o
    5·1 answer
  • Which scenario involves acceleration?
    11·1 answer
  • Trees are planned in roads to reduce noise. Justify the statement ​
    11·1 answer
  • If a distance-time graph contains the point (4, 15), what does that tell you about the runner?
    13·1 answer
  • A chemical reaction occurs. Which of the following would indicate that energy is transformed during the reaction?
    14·2 answers
  • A block of wood has a length of 4 cm a width of 5 cm and a height of 10 cm what is the volume of the wood?
    11·1 answer
  • Multiple Intelligences :
    14·1 answer
  • Waves transfer _________________, not the _____________ with it. A ______________________ causes particles in matter to move bac
    9·1 answer
  • If three balls of different materials were dropped at the same time from the same height, which would hit the ground first? (Ass
    7·1 answer
  • Need help with # of protons
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!