It confirmed medeleeve's hypothesis (prediction) and showed the use of his table
Answer:
The answer to the question is
The roller coaster will reach point B with a speed of 14.72 m/s
Explanation:
Considering both kinetic energy KE = 1/2×m×v² and potential energy PE = m×g×h
Where m = mass
g = acceleration due to gravity = 9.81 m/s²
h = starting height of the roller coaster
we have the given variables
h₁ = 36 m,
h₂ = 13 m,
h₃ = 30 m
v₁ = 1.00 m/s
Total energy at point 1 = 0.5·m·v₁² + m·g·h₁
= 0.5 m×1² + m×9.81×36
=353.66·m
Total energy at point 2 = 0.5·m·v₂² + m·g·h₂
= 0.5×m×v₂² + 9.81 × 13 × m = 0.5·m·v₂² + 127.53·m
The total energy at 1 and 2 are not equal due to the frictional force which must be considered
Total energy at point 2 = Total energy at point 1 + work done against friction
Friction work = F×d×cosθ = (
× mg)×60×cos 180 = -117.72m
0.5·m·v₂² + 127.53·m = 353.66·m -117.72m
0.5·m·v₂² = 108.41×m
v₂² = 216.82
v₂ = 14.72 m/s
The roller coaster will reach point B with a speed of 14.72 m/s
<span>3.36x10^5 Pascals
The ideal gas law is
PV=nRT
where
P = Pressure
V = Volume
n = number of moles of gas particles
R = Ideal gas constant
T = Absolute temperature
Since n and R will remain constant, let's divide both sides of the equation by T, getting
PV=nRT
PV/T=nR
Since the initial value of PV/T will be equal to the final value of PV/T let's set them equal to each other with the equation
P1V1/T1 = P2V2/T2
where
P1, V1, T1 = Initial pressure, volume, temperature
P2, V2, T2 = Final pressure, volume, temperature
Now convert the temperatures to absolute temperature by adding 273.15 to both of them.
T1 = 27 + 273.15 = 300.15
T2 = 157 + 273.15 = 430.15
Substitute the known values into the equation
1.5E5*0.75/300.15 = P2*0.48/430.15
And solve for P2
1.5E5*0.75/300.15 = P2*0.48/430.15
430.15 * 1.5E5*0.75/300.15 = P2*0.48
64522500*0.75/300.15 = P2*0.48
48391875/300.15 = P2*0.48
161225.6372 = P2*0.48
161225.6372/0.48 = P2
335886.7441 = P2
Rounding to 3 significant figures gives 3.36x10^5 Pascals.
(technically, I should round to 2 significant figures for the result of 3.4x10^5 Pascals, but given the precision of the volumes, I suspect that the extra 0 in the initial pressure was accidentally omitted. It should have been 1.50e5 instead of 1.5e5).</span>
Hi, this sounds like a chemistry question:
If you wanted to separate sand from iron fillings for example, using tweezers would be a great tool to do this, depending on the size of the iron fillings.