Answer:
the equilibrium concentration of [PCl₅] is 3.64*10⁻³ M
Explanation:
for the reaction
PCl₅(g) → PCl₃(g) + Cl₂(g)
where
Kc= [PCl₃]*[Cl₂]/[PCl₅] = 2.0*10¹ M = 20 M
and [A] denote concentrations of A
if initially the mixture is pure PCl₅ , then it will dissociate according to the reaction and since always one mole of PCl₃(g) is generated with one mole of Cl₂(g) , the total number of moles of both at the end is the same → they have the same concentration → [PCl₃(g)] = [Cl₂]=0.27 M
therefore
Kc= [PCl₃]*[Cl₂]/[PCl₅] = 0.27 M* 0.27 M /[PCl₅] = 20 M
[PCl₅] = 0.27 M* 0.27 M / 20 M = 3.64*10⁻³ M
[PCl₅] = 3.64*10⁻³ M
the equilibrium concentration of [PCl₅] is 3.64*10⁻³ M
Kinetic energy is energy that comes from motion. Anything that is currently in motion has kinetic energy.
Let’s look at each example to determine if they have kinetic energy.
First off, a car in the garage: let’s ask ourselves- Is the car in motion?
No, it is sitting in the garage. It is not moving; therefore it doesn’t have any kinetic energy.
Next, a box sitting on a shelf: let’s ask ourselves the same question- Is the box in motion?
No, it is sitting on the shelf. Again, it is not moving. It doesn’t have any kinetic energy.
Our third item is a ball lodged in a tree: again, we will ask ourselves the same question- Is the object moving?
No, it isn’t moving. Again, since it is not moving, it will not have kinetic energy.
Our last item is a frisbee flying through the air: asking ourselves the same question- Is it moving?
Yes, the object is moving. Yes, it has kinetic energy.
The frisbee flying through the air has kinetic energy.
Answer: The molarity of the malonic acid solution is 0.08335 M
Explanation:
To calculate the molarity of acid, we use the equation given by neutralization reaction:
where,
are the n-factor, molarity and volume of acid which is 
are the n-factor, molarity and volume of base which is NaOH.
We are given:
Putting values in above equation, we get:
Thus the molarity of the malonic acid solution is 0.08335 M
Answer:
See explanation and image attached
Explanation:
Alkenes undergo hydrogenation to give the corresponding alkanes. Where the structure of the original alkene is unknown, we can deduce the structure of the alkene from the structure of the products obtained when it undergoes various chemical reactions.
Now, the fact that we obtained 2-methylhexane upon hydrogenation and the two compounds had different heats of hydrogenation means that the two compounds were geometric isomers. The original compounds must have been cis-2-methyl-3-hexene and trans-2-methyl-3-hexene.
When reacted with HCl, the same compound C7H15Cl is formed because the stereo chemistry is removed.
However, we know that the trans isomer is more stable than the cis isomer hence the cis isomer always has a higher heat of hydrogenation than the trans isomer. Thus X is cis-2-methyl-3-hexene.
