Answer: The answer is an ionic bond
Answer:
Increasing the concentration of the reagents makes the collision between two molecules of the reagents more likely, thereby increasing the probability that the reaction will occur between these reagents.
As for the relationship between concentration and volume, density also comes into play, a higher volume, lower molarity and also lower concentration.
The pressure when increasing could generate a closer approach between the particles, therefore generating an increase in the reaction speed.
Pressure and volume are related but inversely proportional, therefore if the volume increases the pressure decreases and so on.
the reaction rate increases as the contact surface area increases. This is due to the fact that more solid particles are exposed and can be reached by reactant molecules.
A perfect reaction where the collision is promoted and the reaction speed advances is with the presence of a solvent, with an increase in pressure and a decrease in volume, with an increase in the exposure of the surface, with the presence of a catalyst, with increasing temperature and with increasing entrance
Explanation:
The reaction rate is defined as the amount of substance that is transformed into a certain reaction per unit of volume and time. For example, the oxidation of iron under atmospheric conditions is a slow reaction that can take many years but over time it is oxidized sooner or later by the oxygenation of its surface layer, but the combustion of butane in a fire is a reaction that happens in fractions of seconds, giving rise to an exothermic reaction with products such as CO2 and H2O
Answer:
1. The product has a higher Rf value on a silica gel TLC plate because it is more polar than the starting methyl benzoate.
2. False
3. True
Explanation:
In chromatography, there is a stationary phase and a mobile phase. The ratio of the distance moved by a component and the distance moved by the solvent gives the retention factor (Rf).
Since silica gel is a polar solvent, it will retain the more polar product methyl m-nitrobenzoate compared to the methyl benzoate starting material.
In comparing the electrophillic aromatic substitution of m-nitrobenzoate and methyl benzoate, we must remember that the presence of electron withdrawing groups (such as -NO2 and -CHO) on the aromatic compound deactivates the compound towards electrophillic aromatic substitution hence, methyl m-nitrobenzoate is less reactive than methyl benzoate in Electrophilic Aromatic Substition and Methyl benzoate is less reactive than benzene in Electrophilic Aromatic Substition
The pressure increase does not affect the equilibrium shift reaction.