The electron should experience a greater acceleration due to it's significantly smaller mass and should fall through distance "d" in a shorter amount of time.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The electron force can be expressed as F=qE. According to Newton's second law of motion force can be expressed as F=ma. This can be written as a=F/m. Substituting electric force expression for "F" in this equation, we get a=qE/m. This means acceleration is conversely proportional to mass and directly to electric field and charge. This means that proton having significantly larger mass than electron should experience smaller amount of acceleration and would take longer to fall at distance "d".
On the other hand, the electron would experience greater acceleration due to it's significantly smaller mass and would fall faster at distance "d", unlike the situation of proton.
Zinc would be considered the strongest reducing agent.
<h3>Reducing agent</h3>
A reducing agent is a chemical species that "donates" one electron to another chemical species in chemistry (called the oxidizing agent, oxidant, oxidizer, or electron acceptor). Earth metals, formic acid, oxalic acid, and sulfite compounds are a few examples of common reducing agents.
Reducers have excess electrons (i.e., they are already reduced) in their pre-reaction states, whereas oxidizers do not. Usually, a reducing agent is in one of the lowest oxidation states it can be in. The oxidation state of the oxidizer drops while the oxidizer's oxidation state, which measures the amount of electron loss, increases. The agent in a redox process whose oxidation state rises, which "loses/donates electrons," which "oxidizes," and which "reduces" is known as the reducer or reducing agent.
Learn more about reducing agent here:
brainly.com/question/2890416
#SPJ4
<h3 />
That is not a question/problem and makes no sense whatsoever
Answer:
d. 127 g/mol.
Explanation:
Hello!
In this case, since we have the amount of molecules of this this compound, we are able to compute the moles out there by using the Avogadro's number:
Which correspond to the moles of X2. Then, by using the mass we are able to compute the molar mass of X2:
It means that the atomic mass of X halves the molar mass of X2, which is then d. 127 g/mol.
Best regards!
Answer:
lighting a match is the answer.
