Explanation:
attribute of a person that often cannot be measured directly but can be assessed using numbers of indicators or manifest variables
The correct answer to your question is noble gases are stable <span>due to having the maximum number of valence electrons their outer shell can hold. Meaning their outer shells are stable.
Hope this helps let me know!</span>
Cells are too small to see with the naked eye.
It's pretty straight forward, use the cross-out method.
1) Microscopes MAGNIFY images, they don't color the cells. In fact, scientists have to use these chemicals to "stain" or color the cells to see them more easily through microscopes.
2) If the lenses of a microscope reduced the image of an organism to the size of a cell, you'd be seeing a very tiny human through your microscope, instead of actual cells.
3) Microscopes don't "trap" anything. In fact, scientists use plates or slides under microscopes to contain what they're studying.
For the first question, salt is soluble while sand is insoluble or not dissolvable in water. The salt should have vanished or melted, but the sand stayed noticeable or visible, making a dark brown solution probably with some sand particles caught on the walls of the container when the boiling water was put in to the mixture of salt and sand. The solubility of a chemical can be disturbed by temperature, and in the case of salt in water, the hot temperature of the boiling water enhanced the salt's capability to melt in it.
For the second question, the melted or dissolved salt should have easily made its way through the filter paper and into the second container, while the undissolved and muddy sand particles is caught on the filter paper. The size of the pores of the filter paper didn’t change. On the contrary, the size of the salt became smaller because it has been dissolved which is also the reason why it was able to go through the filter paper, while the size of the sand may have doubled or even tripled which made it harder to pass through.
