But we do not know whether the force is pushing or pulling (the same direction (both forces are parallel) but: .........[ ]<-F-- or .......[ ]--F-->). I suppose the correct answer is B
1. If we increase the distance to twice it's original value, the light intensity is reduced by one-fourth, the light intensity would be:
I0/4
2. rms magnetic field is inversely proportional to distance, so the new rms magnetic field would be:
B0/2
3. average energy density is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, so the new average energy density is:
E0/4
It is important to look at all the information's that are given in the question very closely. Let us write them write first.
Radius of the spa = <span>5/√2-1 feet
Now
Perimeter of the circle = </span><span>2πr
= 2</span>π (5/√2-1)
= <span>π(5/(√2-1)*(√2+1)/(√2+1) </span>
<span> = 2π(5/(√2+1))/(2-1) </span>
<span> = 10π(√2+1)
I hope that the procedure is clear enough for you to understand.</span>
Answer:
(B) False
Explanation:
No, it is not possible to have thunder without lightning. Thunder is a direct result of lightning.
