1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
iogann1982 [59]
3 years ago
9

two point charges of 5*10^-19 C and 20*10^-19C are separated by a distance of 2m. at which point on the line joining them will h

ave the electric field zero?​
Physics
1 answer:
Aneli [31]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

On that line segment between the two charges, at approximately 0.7\; \rm m away from the smaller charge (the one with a magnitude of 5 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C,) and approximately 1.3\; \rm m from the larger charge (the one with a magnitude of 20 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C.)

Explanation:

Each of the two point charges generate an electric field. These two fields overlap at all points in the space around the two point charges. At each point in that region, the actual electric field will be the sum of the field vectors of these two electric fields.

Let k denote the Coulomb constant, and let q denote the size of a point charge. At a distance of r away from the charge, the electric field due to this point charge will be:

\displaystyle E = \frac{k\, q}{r^2}.

At the point (or points) where the electric field is zero, the size of the net electrostatic force on any test charge should also be zero.

Consider a positive test charge placed on the line joining the two point charges in this question. Both of the two point charges here are positive. They will both repel the positive test charge regardless of the position of this test charge.

When the test charge is on the same side of both point charges, both point charges will push the test charge in the same direction. As a result, the two electric forces (due to the two point charges) will not balance each other, and the net electric force on the test charge will be non-zero.  

On the other hand, when the test charge is between the two point charges, the electric forces due to the two point charges will counteract each other. This force should be zero at some point in that region.

Keep in mind that the electric field at a point is zero only if the electric force on any test charge at that position is zero. Therefore, among the three sections, the line segment between the two point charges is the only place where the electric field could be zero.

Let q_1 = 5\times 10^{-19}\; \rm C and q_2 = 20 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C. Assume that the electric field is zero at r meters to the right of the 5\times 10^{-19}\; \rm C point charge. That would be (2 - r) meters to the left of the 20 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C point charge. (Since this point should be between the two point charges, 0 < r < 2.)

The electric field due to q_1 = 5\times 10^{-19}\; \rm C would have a magnitude of:

\displaystyle | E_1 | = \frac{k\cdot q_1}{r^2}.

The electric field due to q_2 = 20 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C would have a magnitude of:

\displaystyle | E_2 | = \frac{k\cdot q_2}{(2 - r)^2}.

Note that at all point in this section, the two electric fields E_1 and E_2 will be acting in opposite directions. At the point where the two electric fields balance each other precisely, | E_1 | = | E_2 |. That's where the actual electric field is zero.

| E_1 | = | E_2 | means that \displaystyle \frac{k\cdot q_1}{r^2} = \frac{k\cdot q_2}{(2 - r)^2}.

Simplify this expression and solve for r:

\displaystyle q_1\, (2 - r)^2 - q_2 \, r^2 = 0.

\displaystyle 5\times (2 - r)^2 - 20\, r^2 = 0.

Either r = -2 or \displaystyle r = \frac{2}{3}\approx 0.67 will satisfy this equation. However, since this point (the point where the actual electric field is zero) should be between the two point charges, 0 < r < 2. Therefore, (-2) isn't a valid value for r in this context.

As a result, the electric field is zero at the point approximately 0.67\; \rm m away the 5\times 10^{-19}\; \rm C charge, and approximately 2 - 0.67 \approx 1.3\; \rm m away from the 20 \times 10^{-19}\; \rm C charge.

You might be interested in
A spring with a rest length of 0.7 m has a spring constant of 70 N/m. It is stretched and now has a length of 2.5 m. What is the
pentagon [3]

Answer:

<em>113.4 J</em>

Explanation:

<u>Elastic Potential Energy</u>

Is the energy stored in an elastic material like a spring of constant k, in which case the energy is proportional to the square of the change of length Δx and the constant k.

\displaystyle PE = \frac{1}{2}k(\Delta x)^2

The spring has a natural length of 0.7 m and a spring constant of k=70 N/m. When the spring is stretched to a length of 2.5 m, the change of length is

Δx = 2.5 m - 0.7 m = 1.8 m

The energy stored in the spring is:

\displaystyle PE = \frac{1}{2}70(1.8)^2

PE = 113.4 J

7 0
3 years ago
1.What is a medulla? What do forensic scientists use this for?
maxonik [38]

A medulla is a group of cells that are going through hair, forensic scientist use it to find out the pigment, (color), and the shape.

4 0
4 years ago
A 0.54 kg air hockey puck is initially at rest. What will it's kinetic energy energy be after a net force of 0.56 N acts on it f
Rufina [12.5K]

Answer:

Kf = 470 mJ

Explanation:

  • According the work-energy theorem, the change in the kinetic energy of one object, is equal to the net work done on it.
  • Since the puck is initially at rest, the change is kinetic energy is just the final kinetic energy of the puck.
  • Assuming that the net force is horizontal, and causes a horizontal displacement also, we can find the net work on the puck as follows:

       W_{net} = F_{net} * \Delta X = 0.56 N * 0.84 m = 0.47 J = 470 mJ (1)

  • As we have already said, (1) is equal to the final kinetic energy of the puck:
  • ⇒ Kf = 470 mJ  (2)
8 0
3 years ago
A weight lifter struggles but manages to keep a heavy barbell abovehis head. Occasionally he slips and the barbell starts to fal
shutvik [7]
A) The lifter's and the barbell's force are equal and opposite in direction
B) The lifter's force is greater than that of the barbell and in the upward direction
C) The barbell's force is greater than that of the lifter and in the downward direction
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Calculate the total resustance<br> Circut 2ohmls, 2Ohlms<br> In parrelle
Colt1911 [192]

Explanation:

total resistance=(2×2)/(2+2)= 1ohms

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the relationship between distance and mass in termsnof gravitational force
    5·2 answers
  • To travel from australia to south africa which direction would you go
    14·1 answer
  • Why is it more comfortable to fall onto a big pillow than onto a wooden floor ?
    12·1 answer
  • How does carbon dioxide affect the atmosphere
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following happens during cell division? Question 7 options: It becomes more difficult for the cell to get rid of wa
    6·1 answer
  • The radioactive isotope U-238 has protons and neutrons.
    7·2 answers
  • A plant was placed in the corner of a room away from a window. What might you observe about the plant after five days?
    7·1 answer
  • Help please <br>the question is in the picture ​
    8·2 answers
  • I need help asap!!!!!!!!
    9·1 answer
  • How fast is an object going if it travels from San Diego to Anaheim in 1.25 hours (hr)? The distance from San Diego to Anaheim i
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!