All categories

3 years ago

What problems would we have if Pascal had failed to give the Pascal's law? Write some points.

2 answers:

4 0

Hydraulic jacks, automobile brakes and even the lift generated on airplane wings can be explained using Pascal's principle. Pascal's principle is based on the idea that fluids at rest are incompressible, allowing very large forces to be transmitted with the application of a smaller force.

Gemiola [76]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Pascal's law states that a change in pressure at any point in an enclosed fluid is transmitted equally throughout the fluid.

Explanation:

Applications of Pascal's law include

>The hidden standard of the water powered jack and pressure driven press.

>Power intensification in the slowing mechanism of most engine vehicles.

>Utilized in artesian wells, water pinnacles, and dams.

>Scuba jumpers must comprehend this rule. At a profundity of 10 meters submerged, pressure is double the environmental weight adrift level, and increments by around 100 kPa for each expansion of 10 m depth.[5]

>Generally Pascal's standard is applied to bound space (static flow), however because of the consistent flow process, Pascal's rule can be applied to the lift oil instrument (which can be represented as a U tube with pistons on either end).

Without Pascal's law, none of the above could be possible.

You might be interested in

The nearest star to our planet other than the sun , is 4.4 light year away.One light-year is the distance light travels in a yea

lozanna [386]

Answer:

1606

The main reason for using light years, however, is because the distances we deal with in space are immense. If we stick to miles or kilometers we quickly run into unwieldy numbers just measuring the distance to the nearest star: a dim red dwarf called Proxima Centauri that sits a mere 24,000,000,000,000 miles away!

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the statements concerning light are true? The speed of light is the same no matter what material it is traveling throug

wel

Answer:

The statements that are true concerning light are the last three statements:

Its propagation direction is perpendicular to both the electric field and the magnetic field.

It moves at a constant speed through a vacuum.

The speed of light in matter is less than the speed of light in a vacuum.

Explanation:

Light is electromagnetic waves.

The properties of the electromagnetic waves were established by James Clerk Maxwell.

They included that they are the result of the oscillation of a magnetic field in phase with an electric field which are always is always perpendicular to each other.

Also, the electromagnetic waves propagate at right-angles to the direction of both the magnetic and the electric field, meaning that they are a type of transverse wave.

Thus, the second statement ("Its propagation direction is parallel to both the electric field and the magnetic field") is false, and the fourth statement ("Its propagation direction is perpendicular to both the electric field and the magnetic field") is true.

On the other hand, it is a postulate of the special theory of relativity that the speed of light is a constant (absolute value) in vacuum: nothing can travel faster than what light travels in vacuum. Thus, the fifth statement, "It moves at a constant speed through a vacuum" is true.

About the speed of light in matter, it is always less than the speed of light in vacuum. Thus, the first statement, "the speed of light is the same no matter what material it is traveling through", and the third statement "the speed of light in matter is greater than the speed of light in a vacuum" are false; while the last statement, "the speed of light in matter is less than the speed of light in a vacuum" is true.

The explanation on why the speed of light is less in a medium than in vacuum is related with the fact that at nanoscopic level the waves suffer polarization which means deviations from the straighi path, which makes that the net straight propagation is slower.

8 0

3 years ago

How to reword this? What does it mean?

schepotkina [342]

This passage is about how people research food, how much calories, much much energy you get from it, etc. It also explains the different kinds of food get a certain amount of calories. Some calories burn quicker than the other.

5 0

2 years ago

What type of electricity comes from an outlet

zalisa [80]

There’s many types of electricity that comes from an outlet, like [15A, 120 Volt Outlets] those are more common in older homes and can come in two versions [Two-pronged outlet and three-pronged version]

8 0

3 years ago

To have the highest magnification in a telescope, the focal length of the objective lens should be _________ and the focal lengt

Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

Large; small.

Explanation:

A telescope can be defined as an optical instrument or device which comprises of a curved mirror and lenses used for viewing distant objects i.e objects that are very far away such as stars and other planetary bodies. The first telescope was invented by Sir Isaac Newton.

To have the highest magnification in a telescope, the focal length of the objective lens should be large and the focal length of the eyepiece lens should be small.

This ultimately implies that, the eyepiece lens has a small focal length while the objective lens has a large focal length.

6 0

2 years ago