Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

Why is "Creation-Science" not considered true science?

2 answers:

jarptica [38.1K]3 years ago

8 0

My answer would be because it is based on the belief that God created the Earth and cannot be proven by science but requires someone to believe that it is true

qwelly [4]3 years ago

7 0

You may not believe this, but I do. The true answer is because there is so much evolution in the world people are starting to fall for it, evolution is not true and is completely ridiculous. Creation Science is true, God created the Heavens and the Earth (Genesis 1:1), Creation Science explains how it is true and why you should not fall for believing evolution, it explains Science in Biblical way that is true. I love reading about Creation Science and I am interested in becoming a Creationist! I am sorry if I offended anyone in any way, I don't intend to, I am just telling you the right answer.

You might be interested in

When work is done on a spring to stretch it, elastic potential energy is stored in the spring.

aniked [119]

Explanation:

I think its true

hope it helps

6 0

3 years ago

Is the relationship between the length of a pendulum and its period is valid at all times?

Stels [109]

Yes it is valid all the times under the consideration of acceleration due to gravity .it is not valid on space where there is no influence of gravity

4 0

3 years ago

What is a description of compounds?

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]

Compounds are elements that are chemically combined, like water for example (it’s both hydrogen and oxygen.)

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

If the pitched ball was traveling 77 mph before stanton's bat hit it and 120 mph after his bat hit it, by what amount did the sp

Mice21 [21]

here we will use the concept of Newton's III law

as per Newton's III law the impulse given to the ball is same as the impulse lost by the bat

So here we will say

impulse gain by the ball = impulse lost by the bat

$m_1(v_f - v_i) = m_2(\Delta v)$

given that

$m_1 = 5 ounce$

$m_2 = 32 ounce$

For ball the change in speed will be

$v_f - v_i = (120 - 77)mph$

now from above equation

$5\times (120 - 77) = 32 \times \Delta v$

$\Delta v = 6.72 mph$

so speed of bat will decrease by 6.72 mph

3 0

2 years ago

A light beam travels at 1.94×108 in quartz. The wavelength of the light in quartz is 355 .Part AWhat is the index of refraction

Alja [10]

A) 1.55

The speed of light in a medium is given by:

$v=\frac{c}{n}$

where

$c=3\cdot 10^8 m/s$ is the speed of light in a vacuum

n is the refractive index of the material

In this problem, the speed of light in quartz is

$v=1.94\cdot 10^8 m/s$

So we can re-arrange the previous formula to find n, the index of refraction of quartz:

$n=\frac{c}{v}=\frac{3\cdot 10^8 m/s}{1.94\cdot 10^8 m/s}=1.55$

B) 550.3 nm

The relationship between the wavelength of the light in air and in quartz is

$\lambda=\frac{\lambda_0}{n}$

where

$\lambda$ is the wavelenght in quartz

$\lambda_0$ is the wavelength in air

n is the refractive index

For the light in this problem, we have

$\lambda=355 nm\\n=1.55$

Therefore, we can re-arrange the equation to find $\lambda_0$ , the wavelength in air:

$\lambda_0 = n\lambda=(1.55)(355 nm)=550.3 nm$

4 0

3 years ago