Answer You need to consider that the gravity on earth is 9.8 m/s/s. This means any object you let go on the earths surface will gain 9.8 m/s of speed every second. You need to apply a force on the object in the opposite direction to avoid this acceleration. If you are pushing something up at a constant speed, you are just resisting earths acceleration. The more massive and object is, the greater force is needed to accelerate it. The equation is Force = mass*acceleration. So for a 2kg object in a 9.8 m/s/s gravity you need 2kg*9.8m/s/s = 19.6 Newtons to counteract gravity. Work or energy = force * distance. So to push with 19.6 N over a distance of 2 meters = 19.6 N*2 m = 39.2 Joules of energy. There is an equation that puts together those two equations I just used and it is E = mgh
The amount of Energy to lift an object is (mass) * (acceleration due to gravity) * (height)
:Hence, the Work done to life the mass of 2 kg to a height of 10 m is 196 J. Hope it helps❤️❤️❤️
Explanation:
An object undergoing <span>uniform circular motion </span>is moving with a constant speed. Nonetheless, it is accelerating due to its change in direction. So I'm thinking velocity
Under general relativity, there is no 'before the Big Bang'. The problem is that time is itself a part of the universe and is affected by matter and energy. Because of the huge densities just after the Big Bang, time itself is warped in such a way that it cannot go back before that event. It is somewhat like asking what is north of the north pole.
The conservation of matter and energy states that the total amount of mass and energy at one time is the same at any other time. Notice how time is a crucial part of this statement. To even talk about conservation laws, you have to have time.
The upshot is that the Big Bang did not break the conservation laws because time itself is part of the universe and started at the Big Bang and because the conservation laws need to have time in their statements.
At the highest point in its trajectory, the ball's acceleration is zero but its velocity is not zero.
<h3>What's the velocity of the ball at the highest point of the trajectory?</h3>
- At the highest point, the ball doesn't go more high. So its vertical velocity is zero.
- However, the ball moves horizontal, so its horizontal component of velocity is non - zero i.e. u×cosθ.
- u= initial velocity, θ= angle of projection
<h3>What's the acceleration of the ball at the highest point of projectile?</h3>
- During the whole projectile motion, the earth exerts the gravitational force with a acceleration of gravity along vertical direction.
- But as there's no acceleration along vertical direction, so the acceleration along vertical direction is zero.
Thus, we can conclude that the acceleration is zero and velocity is non-zero at the highest point projectile motion.
Disclaimer: The question was given incomplete on the portal. Here is the complete question.
Question: Player kicks a soccer ball in a high arc toward the opponent's goal. At the highest point in its trajectory
A- neither the ball's velocity nor its acceleration are zero.
B- the ball's acceleration points upward.
C- the ball's acceleration is zero but its velocity is not zero.
D- the ball's velocity points downward.
Learn more about the projectile motion here:
brainly.com/question/24216590
#SPJ1
