Answer:
a. 5.23 m/s² b. 44.23 N
Explanation:
a. What is the centripetal acceleration of the hammer?
The centripetal acceleration a = rω² where r = radius of circle and ω = angular speed.
Now r = length of chain = 1.4 m and ω = 0.595 rev/s = 0.595 × 2π/s = 3.74 rad/s.
So a = rω²
= 1.4 m × (3.74 rad/s)²
= 5.23 m/s²
b. What is the tension in the chain?
The tension in the chain, T = ma where m = mass of hammer = 8.45 kg and a = centripetal acceleration of hammer = 5.23 m/s². This tension is the centripetal force on the hammer.
So, T = 8.45 kg × 5.23 m/s²
= 44.23 N
Answer: E. Electron pair donor
Explanation:
According to Arrhenius concept, a base is defined as a substance which donates hydroxide ions 
when dissolved in water and an acid is defined as a substance which donates hydronium ions 
in water.
According to the Bronsted Lowry conjugate acid-base theory, an acid is defined as a substance which donates protons and a base is defined as a substance which accepts protons.
According to the Lewis concept, an acid is defined as a substance that accepts electron pairs and base is defined as a substance which donates electron pairs.
Hence, the correct statement is Lewis base is Electron pair donor.
Answer:
13.7m
Explanation:
Since there's no external force acting on the astronaut or the satellite, the momentum must be conserved before and after the push. Since both are at rest before, momentum is 0.
After the push
Where 
is the mass of the astronaut, 
is the mass of the satellite, 
is the speed of the satellite. We can calculate the speed 
of the astronaut:
So the astronaut has a opposite direction with the satellite motion, which is further away from the shuttle. Since it takes 7.5 s for the astronaut to make contact with the shuttle, the distance would be
d = vt = 1.83 * 7.5 = 13.7 m
The paragraph is going to be your responsibility but I can provide the pros and cons.
Advantages include the fact that Uranium is a plentiful resource, it is relatively clean, and it takes very little resources to make power.
However disadvantages include radioactive byproducts which need longtime storage. Uranium is also a nonrenewable resource, meaning it can run out. Additionally safety issues regarding melt downs are a major concern.
The satellite with more mass will definitely have a higher speed. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. Although the satellite having more mass should have a larger mass difference to have a noticeable speed change. Otherwise it would be hard to detect the speed change. Also we know that
orbit speed = proportional to square root[(Mass of Earth + Mass of Satellite)/orbit radius]. This explains the answer. <span />
