In a way, all of the answers could be argued for (for example: in the first option: if the scientists' opinions are understood to be "informed understanding of the causes of events"), but one of the options is the best:
Scientific laws describe specific relationships in nature without offering
an explanation.
The reason why I think this is true is that many laws are phased too short and too concise to provide comprehensive explanations, instead they describe the relationships that must hold.
One of the options is pplain false:
Scientific laws explain why natural events occur. -"Scientific laws were theories that have been tested, proven, and adopted as laws." - since they are not adopted as laws.
Magnetizing steel is a physical change, not a chemical change.
Answer: let me figure it out rlly quick
Explanation:
Answer:There are important differences between naturally occurring sugars, ... Understanding these differences can help you make choices that are better for your health. ... of energy, along with a bevy of vitamins, minerals, and phytonutrients. ... sugar substitutes, but many people find they have an unpleasant
Explanation:
Explanation:
c . produces bile is not the function of slaiva
