Answer:
ma= ma
m⋅a = m⋅a
And equivalently:
am=ma
a⋅m = m⋅a
Explanation:
Question
Assuming this question "Similar to what you see in your textbook, you can generally omit the multiplication symbol as you answer questions online, except when the symbol is needed to make your meaning clear. For example, 1*10^5 is not the same as 110^5 . When you need to be explicit, type * (Shift + 8) to insert the multiplication operator. You will see a multiplication dot (⋅) appear in the answer box. Do not use the symbol x. For example, for the expression ma,
typing m⋅a would be correct, but mxa would be incorrect".
Solution to the problem
For this case we want to write a expression for ma, and based on the previous info we can write:
ma= ma
m⋅a = m⋅a
And equivalently:
am=ma
a⋅m = m⋅a
But is not correct do this:
mxa=mxa
axm = mxa
Answer:
3.0 seconds
Explanation:
We can solve the problem by considering the horizontal motion of the ball only. In fact, the ball moves by uniform motion (constant speed) along the horizontal direction, since there are no forces acting in this direction. The horizontal speed of the ball is given by:
and it does not change during the motion.
We also know that the ball travels a horizontal distance of d = 60 m, so we can find the time it takes to cover the distance by using the equation:
Answer:
W = 0J
Explanation:
The work done by the dresser is described as
W = f d (cos θ)
F has been given as the weight of this dresser. And it is 3500 N
d = 0 m
When you put these values into the equation
W = 3500 x 0 x cosθ
W = 0 J
This value tells us that the work done on this dresser is zero. No work has been done. Therefore the last option answers the question.
Answer:
D) Fusion requires high temperatures and pressures, so how have they reduced the energy cost for it?
Explanation:
Fusion requires high temperatures and pressure for initiation of reaction . There is no chain reaction in it so there is no problem of controlling the problem . On the other hand , the reaction tends to stop as soon as temperature goes down due to heat getting dissipated . There is no problem of fuel as its fuel is deuterium which is present in nature in large amount . The question which is pertinent is that the cost involved in attaining so high temperature is very high so is it cost effective to produce energy by incurring so much of cost . Producing energy by using so much of energy in the beginning appears to be preposterous.
Answer:
MISSING DATA, SPEED AT WHICH IT WAS LAUNCHED OR INITIAL
DISTANCE THAT REACHED UPWARDS
Explanation:
ANYWAY I LEAVE YOU THE LINK, AUÍ AHY MORE INFORMATION ON THE
SUBJECT.
https://gscourses.thinkific.com
