Answer:
13,400 m/s²
Explanation:
Average acceleration is the change in velocity over time:
a = Δv / t
a = (22.0 m/s − (-25.0 m/s)) / 0.00350 s
a = 13,400 m/s²
The frequency of the
scattered photon decreases or it will be lower compare to the frequency of
incident photon. An x-ray photon scatters in one direction after a collision
and some energy is transferred to the electron as it recoils in another
direction resulting to have less energy in the scattered photon. In addition, the
frequencies will also depend on the differences of the angle at which the
scattered photon leaves the collision and this incident is called Compton Effect.
If you have a lump of solid at its melting point ... like ice at 32°F ...
you have to put a certain amount of heat into it just to change it
to water at 32°F. That amount of heat, that's used just to change
a solid lump into liquid without changing its temperature, is called
the heat of fusion for that substance.
The number is different for every substance.
For water, it takes 336 joules of heat to melt 1 gram of ice
into 1 gram of water, all at 32°F (0°C).
That's an enormous latent heat of fusion ... more than almost any
other known substance. That's why ice is such a good choice
when you need something to put in your drink to cool it down.
Ice absorbs a huge amount of heat before it melts and the drink
gets watered down.
Answer: Provided in the explanation
Explanation:
I have understood that I have been influenced by the 'affinity bias' for quite a while. It caused me to feel fascination and feel better and right about individuals who had comparable intrigue and thought designs. I sort of began to feel this is the one for me based on those likenesses yet later used to be miserable when I comprehended that those similitudes are not many and insufficient consistently. I have begun to beat this inclination by rehearsing self reflection. I have begun to think about what causes me to feel pulled in to somebody and on the off chance that I introspect that it's exclusively founded on likenesses, at that point I cause myself to get that and monitoring that helps in escaping the inclination.
I make an effort not to get into the snare of paradoxes in my own announcements yet I have been forced to bear deceptions during contentions. One deception which I have encountered most is the 'Foul play' error as there have been a great deal of occurrences when individuals began to tear down me and my family when they couldn't win on a contention regarding balanced and rationale.
Basic reasoning causes us in understanding our defects and those issues of our own which keeps us from taking better choices and furthermore forestalls us tackling issues in more successful manners. Through basic reasoning, one can reflect and recognize utilization of deceptions in the contentions and that will help him in deciphering the circumstance from an alternate perspective. He will assess the circumstance better and through appropriate induction, he will have the option to get over those issues in thinking and subsequently, have the option to take better and more powerful choices for taking care of an issue.
The most fascinating idea which I have learned is that of the utilization of reflection or explicitly self reflection to comprehend ourselves better and furthermore to display basic reasoning appropriately. Being said that, I am a still somewhat confused about the manners by which we can reflect appropriately at each circumstance in a successful manner. This disarray remains in light of the fact that most deceptions and predispositions are oblivious in nature while the basic considering aptitudes reflection is cognizant and I meander whether a cognizant ability will have the option to break down and distinguish each oblivious inclinations or whether a few guards will keep a few inclinations covered up.
Answer:
How long or wide something is
Explanation:
