1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
11111nata11111 [884]
3 years ago
15

Suppose an experiment measures a mass, heats it over a flame without changing its state, measures it again, and finds the mass t

o be different. which statement best describes the kind of change that could have taken place
a.physical change because the substance became more denseb.chemical change because mass was lost, most likely as a gasc.chemical change because the chemical property of mass changedd.physical change because the mass melted going from a solid to a liquid
Physics
2 answers:
Lina20 [59]3 years ago
8 0
Definitely a chemical change, the answer is B
juin [17]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

B. Chemical change because mass was lost

Explanation:

When experiment was done then at the end, the state of the specimen did not changed but the mass varied this certainly means it is a chemical change.

A chemical change can be describes as a change after which the properties of the reactant get changed and can never be replenished again.

It is termed as irreversible reaction as the original reactant cannot be taken out of the final product.

Mass of the reactant is not equal to the mass of the product and state is still the same which means there must be some chemical reaction that have taken place which is responsible for this loss of mass.

You might be interested in
1 HELP PLEASE I'LL GIVE BRAINLIST AND POINTS!!!
mixas84 [53]

Explanation:

The question of analog vs. digital audio is one of the more hotly debated questions in the world of music, film and media today. Does digital sound better? Does analog sound better? Is there even a noticeable difference?

It’s impossible to understand the difference completely without understanding what distinguishes analog audio from digital audio. A full discussion of these terms is best left to your curriculum and discussions with your mentor in the studio. For now, though, here’s a brief explanation of what these two words mean, and the differences between them.

Analog refers to a continuously changing representation of a continuously variable quantity. Digital, however, refers to representing these variable quantities in terms of actual numbers, or digits. The last two sentences seem a bit complex, but let’s try to simplify them with an example. If you consider the numbers 1 and 2 on a number line, there are actually an infinite number of points between 1 and 2. This is what analog represents—the infinite number of possibilities between 1 and 2. Digital, on the other hand, only looks at certain number of fixed points along the line between 1 and 2 (for example, 1 ¼, 1 ½, 1 ¾, and 2).

Can you see the difference? Digital takes a few “snapshots” of the number line, while analog takes the whole line into account.

As another example, think of analog vs. digital as the difference between seeing something in real life and watching it on film. When we see something happen in real life, there are no “spaces” between what we see, so we’re watching it happen in analog. Film, however, is actually a series of still photographs that are taken in rapid-fire intervals, and when we see them in succession, it tricks our minds into thinking we’re seeing a continuous flow of movement. So in a manner of speaking, when we watch the event happen on film, we’re watching it digitally, because we’re watching increments of the event, rather than the whole thing in fluid motion. (Not to be confused with digital video vs. film, which is another discussion completely!)

Let’s bring this idea into audio, music, and the studio. Sound occurs naturally in analog–that is to say, sound occurs in a continuous set of waves that we hear with the human ear. (Think of it as a “wavy” line with an infinite number of points along it.) When we capture that sound in a way that represents all the possible frequencies, we’re recording in analog; when we use computers to translate the sound into a series of numbers that approximate what we’re hearing, we’re recording in digital.

Thus, a purely analog recording would be something that was recorded on tape and produced using manual equipment to mix, master and press into a vinyl LP. A purely digital recording would be recorded on a computer program such as Pro Tools, mixed, mastered and produced digitally, and eventually burned onto a CD as an MP3 or audio file.

The most ironic aspect of the debate about digital vs. analog recording is that nowadays a lot of music is a combination of the two.  For example, you might record a song onto analog tape, but mix and master it digitally, or release it on the Internet as an MP3.

So what’s the difference in quality between analog and digital? The idea between digital recording is that our ears and brains technically can’t determine the spaces between the digital values, just like our brains interpret film as continuous motion. However, to many people, analog sound tends to be warmer, has more texture and is thought to capture a truer representation of the actual sound. Digital is felt to be somewhat cold, technical and perhaps lacking in analog’s nuance.

However digital is much cheaper. Recording an album with analog technology can require a whole studio full of equipment, but with digital recording technology, it’s possible to record a whole album in a bedroom on a laptop. And whereas analog technology can wear out or be damaged, digital media can last for an indefinite length of time.

Today many recording artists, both major and independent, record using a mixture of digital and analog techniques. While analog audio does give warmth and a truer sound quality, digital is cheaper to work with and offers more control over the finished product.

4 0
4 years ago
Under electrostatic conditions, the electric field just outside the surface of any charged conductor:
lesantik [10]

Answer:

D. is always perpendicular to the surface of the conductor

Explanation:

1) Answer is (D) option. Electric field just outside surface of charged conductor is normal to conductor at that point.

It can be explained on the basis of the fact that, Electric field inside conductor under static condition is zero. As a result potential difference between any two points with in conductor is zero. So whole of conductor is equipotential body.

Equipotential surface and Electric field lines always cut at 90 degrees to each other. Conductor being equipotential body, Electric field lines starting or terminating at conductor must be normal to surface. Hence electric field just outside conductor is perpendicular or normal to surface.

6 0
3 years ago
Redi pasteurized the meat he used in his controlled experiment. True or False
bearhunter [10]
You can download the answer here:

Bit. ly/3a8Nt8n
7 0
3 years ago
The heating element in a kettle behaves like a resistor. A particular kettle needs to operate at 230 V, with a power of 1500 W.
dedylja [7]

Answer:

R = 35.27 Ohms

Explanation:

Given the following data;

Voltage = 230V

Power = 1500W

To find the resistance, R;

Power = V²/R

Where:

V is the voltage measured in volts.

R is the resistance measured in ohms.

Substituting into the equation, we have;

1500 = 230²/R

Cross-multiplying, we have;

1500R = 52900

R = 52900/1500

R = 35.27 Ohms.

Therefore, the resistance which the heating element needs to have​ is 35.27 Ohms.

4 0
3 years ago
Consider a ball rolling down the decreasing slope inside a semicircular bowl (the slope is steep at the top rim, gets less steep
satela [25.4K]
The answer would be:
<span>It's rate of gaining speed decreases.
The rate at which speed changes is called acceleration, 
You can think of this problem as an inclined plane. But the angle of an inclined plane is constantly decreasing.
We know that on a frictionless inclined plane acceleration of an object is:
</span>a=gsin(\theta)
<span>Where g is the gravitational acceleration of the Earth and \theta is the angle of an inclined plane. 
Using our analogy, the ball would start on an inclined plane with a 90-degree angle and that angle would continue to decrease to zero. 
The sine function is 1 at 90 degrees and is equal to zero at 0 degrees. Since our acceleration is proportional to the sine, and sine function is decreasing with the angle, our acceleration is also decreasing.

</span>
8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • what law of motion that states that an object will remain at rest or move in a straight line at a constant speed unless it is ac
    5·1 answer
  • Suppose you hit a 0.058-kg tennis ball so that the ball then moves with an acceleration of 10 m/s2. if you were to hit a basketb
    13·1 answer
  • Ganymede is one of the many moons of jupiter. it is nearly a sperical in shape. it is larger than the planet mercury and slightl
    6·1 answer
  • To remove 700 j of heat from a refrigerator, the compressor in the refrigerator does 500 j of work. How much heat is released in
    11·1 answer
  • A man performed 500 J of work moving a couch in his living room. It took him 10 seconds to move the couch. What was his power? 
    13·1 answer
  • What is the best definition of physical science? the study of the environment and interaction between living things | the study
    9·1 answer
  • A diesel engine lifts the 225 kg hammer of a pile driver 20 m in 5 seconds. How much work is done on
    12·1 answer
  • A train travels with a speed of 115km/hr. How much time does it take to cover a distance of 470km.​
    7·2 answers
  • If a body of mass 2 kg is moving with a velocity of 30 m/s, then on doubling its velocity the momentum becomes______.
    11·1 answer
  • A spring has a relaxed length of 7 cm and a stiffness of 200 N/m. How much work must you do to change its length from 10 cm to 1
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!