Hello there!
Essentially, a control variable is what is kept the same throughout the experiment, and it is not of primary concern in the experimental outcome. Any change in a control variable in an experiment would invalidate the correlation of dependent variables (DV) to the independent variable (IV), thus skewing the results.
The amount or cost that the user of the energy-efficient bulb save during 100h of use will be $0.319.
<h3>How to calculate the cost?</h3>
For the 11.0W bulb, it should be noted that the value will be:
= 11.0 × 100 × (1/1000) × 0.110
= $0.121
The 40W bulb will be:
= 40 × 100 × (1/1000) × 0.110
= $0.44
Therefore, the amount that will be saved will be:
= $0.44 - $0.121
= $0.319
Learn more about cost on:
brainly.com/question/25109150
#SPJ4
First example: book, m= 0.75 kg, h=1.5 m, g= 9.8 m/s², it has only potential energy Ep,
Ep=m*g*h=0.75*9.8*1.5=11.025 J
Second example: brick, m=2.5 kg, v=10 m/s, h=4 m, it has potential energy Ep and kinetic energy Ek,
E=Ep+Ek=m*g*h + (1/2)*m*v²=98 J + 125 J= 223 J
Third example: ball, m=0.25 kg, v= 10 m/s, it has only kinetic energy Ek
Ek=(1/2)*m*v²=12.5 J.
Fourth example: stone, m=0.7 kg, h=7 m, it has only potential energy Ep,
Ep=m*g*h=0.7*9.8*7=48.02 J
The order of examples starting with the lowest energy:
1. book, 2. ball, 3. stone, 4. brick
Basic solutions are hydroxides therefore the answer is A ca(OH)2
I'll be happy to solve the problem using the information that
you gave in the question, but I have to tell you that this wave
is not infrared light.
If it was a wave of infrared, then its speed would be close
to 300,000,000 m/s, not 6 m/s, and its wavelength would be
less than 0.001 meter, not 12 meters.
For the wave you described . . .
Frequency = (speed) / (wavelength)
= (6 m/s) / (12 m)
= 0.5 / sec
= 0.5 Hz .
(If it were an infrared wave, then its frequency would be
greater than 300,000,000,000 Hz.)
