Answer:
4. Electrons move from higher energy states to lower energy states.
Explanation:
When electrons fall from a higher (excited) energy state to a lower energy state, it loses/gives out energy.
This energy is given out by the emission of photons (quanta of light) by the electron.
Answer:
6.88 mA
Explanation:
Given:
Resistance, R = 594 Ω
Capacitance = 1.3 μF
emf, V = 6.53 V
Time, t = 1 time constant
Now,
The initial current, I₀ = 
or
I₀ = 
or
I₀ = 0.0109 A
also,
I = ![I_0[1-e^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=I_0%5B1-e%5E%7B-%5Cfrac%7Bt%7D%7B%5Ctau%7D%7D%5D)
here,
τ = time constant
e = 2.717
on substituting the respective values, we get
I = ![0.0109[1-e^{-\frac{\tau}{\tau}}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=0.0109%5B1-e%5E%7B-%5Cfrac%7B%5Ctau%7D%7B%5Ctau%7D%7D%5D)
or
I =
or
I = 0.00688 A
or
I = 6.88 mA
"Frequency decreases" is the one way among the following choices given in the question that <span>frequency change as wavelength increases. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the second option. I hope that this is the answer that has actually come to your desired help.</span>
Complete Question
At what angle should the axes of two Polaroids be placed so as to reduce the intensity of the incident unpolarized light to 1/5.
Answer:
The angle is
Explanation:
From the question we are told that
The light emerging from second Polaroid is 1/5 the unpolarized
Generally the intensity of light emerging from the first Polaroid is mathematically represented as

Generally from the Malus law the intensity of light emerging from the second Polaroid is mathematically represented

=> 
=> 
From the question


=> ![\theta = cos ^{-1} [\sqrt{\frac{2}{5}} ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Ctheta%20%3D%20%20%20cos%20%5E%7B-1%7D%20%5B%5Csqrt%7B%5Cfrac%7B2%7D%7B5%7D%7D%20%20%5D)
=> 