<span>b) The force with a distance of 150 km is 889 N
c) The force with a distance of 50 km is 8000 N
This question looks like a mixture of a question and a critique of a previous answer. I'll attempt to address the original question.
Since the radius of the spherical objects isn't mentioned anywhere, I will assume that the distance from the center of each spherical object is what's being given. The gravitational force between two masses is given as
F = (G M1 M2)/r^2
where
F = Force
G = gravitational constant
M1 = Mass 1
M2 = Mass 2
r = distance between center of masses for the two masses.
So with a r value of 100 km, we have a force of 2000 Newtons. If we change the distance to 150 km, that increases the distance by a factor of 1.5 and since the force varies with the inverse square, we get the original force divided by 2.25. And 2000 / 2.25 = 888.88888.... when rounded to 3 digits gives us 889.
Looking at what looks like an answer of 890 in the question is explainable as someone rounding incorrectly to 2 significant digits.
If the distance is changed to 50 km from the original 100 km, then you have half the distance (50/100 = 0.5) and the squaring will give you a new divisor of 0.25, and 2000 / 0.25 = 8000. So the force increases to 8000 Newtons.</span>
Answer:
Change in potential energy = 7350 Joules
Explanation:
It is given that,
Side of cube, a = 0.5 m
Density of cube, 
The cube is lifted vertically by a crane to a height of 3 m
We know that, density 
So, m = d × V (V = volume of cube = a³)

m = 250 kg
We have to find the change in potential energy of the cube. At ground level, the potential energy is equal to 0.
Potential energy at height h is given by :

PE = 250 kg × 9.8 m/s² ×3 m
PE = 7350 Joules
So, change in potential energy of the cube is 7350 Joules.
If you are working with electricity most people will measure it in watts.
So, A. watts is your best answer.
Hope I helped! ^w^
it is the point at infinity where it is at a distance from the curve equal to the radius of curvature lying on the normal vector. Sorry no diagram