Ask question

Ask question

All categories

alexandr1967 [171]

3 years ago

13

Which describes the properties reflection, absorption, and transmission when the light is shining on the oval end of a silver sp

oon?
A. It reflects all lights, transmits all light, and absorbs some lights
B. It reflects a lot of light, transmits almost no light, and absorbs some light.
C. It reflects some light, transmits some light, and absorbs almost no light.
D. It reflects almost no light, transmits almost no light, and absorbs almost no light.

1 answer:

I am Lyosha [343]3 years ago

5 0

B. It reflects a lot of light, transmits almost no light, and absorbs some light.

You might be interested in

A record is dropped vertically onto a freely rotating (undriven) turntable. Frictional forces act to bring the record and turnta

alexgriva [62]

Answer:

The loss of initial Kinetic energy = 37.88 %

Explanation:

Given:

Rotational inertia of the turntable = $I_t$

Rotational inertia ( $I_r$ ) of the record = $0.61\times I_t$

According to the question:

<em>Frictional forces act to bring the record and turntable to a common angular speed.</em>

So,angular momentum will be conserved as it is an inelastic collision.

Considering the initial and final angular velocity of the turn table as $\omega _i\ ,\ \omega_f$ respectively.

Note :

Angular momentum $(L)$ = Product of moment of inertia $(I)$ and angular velocity $(\omega)$ .

Lets say,

⇒ initial angular momentum = final angular momentum

⇒ $L_i=L_f$

⇒ $(I_t)\times \omega_i = (I_t+I_r)\times \omega_f$

⇒ $\omega _f=\frac{I_t}{I_t+I_r} \times (\omega_i)$ ...equation (i)

Now we will find the ratio of the Kinetic energies.

⇒ $K_i=\frac{I_t\times \omega_i^2}{2}$ ⇒ $K_f=\frac{(I_r+I_t)\times \omega_f^2}{2}$

Their ratios:

⇒ $\frac{K_f}{K_i} =\frac{\frac{(I_t+I_r)\times \omega_f^2}{2} }{\frac{I_t\times \omega_i^2}{2} }$

⇒ $\frac{K_f}{K_i} = {\frac{(I_t+I_r)\times \omega_f^2}{2} } \times {\frac{2}{I_t\times \omega_i^2}}$

Plugging the values of $\omega _f^2$ as $\omega _f^2 =(\frac{I_t}{I_t+I_r} \times \omega_i\ )^2$ from equation (i) in the ratios of the Kinetic energies.

⇒ $\frac{K_f}{K_i} =\frac{(I_t+I_r)\times \frac{(I_t)^2}{(I_t+I_r)^2} \times \omega_i^2}{I_t\times \omega_i^2} =\frac{(I_t)^2}{(I_t+I_r)}\times \frac{1}{I_t}=\frac{I_t}{I_t+I_r}$

Now,

The Kinetic energy lost in fraction can be written as:

⇒ $\frac{K_f-K_i}{K_i}$

Now re-arranging the terms.

$\frac{K_f-K_i}{K_i} =(\frac{K_f}{K_i} -1)= \frac{I_t}{I_t+I_r} -1=\frac{I_t-I_t-I_r}{I_t+I_r} =\frac{-I_r}{(I_t+I_r)}$

Plugging the values of $I_r$ and $I_t$ .

⇒ $\frac{K_f}{K_i} = \frac{-0.61I_t}{0.61I_t+I_t} =\frac{-0.61}{1.61} =-0.3788$

To find the percentage we have to multiply it with $100$ and here negative means for loss of Kinetic energy.

⇒ $\frac{K_f}{K_i} = =-0.3788\times 100= 37.88$

So the percentage of the initial Kinetic energy lost is 37.88

4 0

2 years ago

Consider a uniformly charged sphere of radius Rand total charge Q. The electric field Eout outsidethe sphere (r≥R) is simply tha

AlexFokin [52]

1) Electric potential inside the sphere: $\frac{Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R}(3-\frac{r^2}{R^2})$

2) Ratio Vcenter/Vsurface: 3/2

3) Find graph in attachment

Explanation:

1)

The electric field inside the sphere is given by

$E=\frac{1}{4\pi \epsilon_0}\frac{Qr}{R^3}$

where

$\epsilon_0=8.85\cdot 10^{-12}F/m$ is the vacuum permittivity

Q is the charge on the sphere

R is the radius of the sphere

r is the distance from the centre at which we compute the field

For a radial field,

$E(r)=-\frac{dV(r)}{dr}$

Therefore, we can find the potential at distance r by integrating the expression for the electric field. Calculating the difference between the potential at r and the potential at R,

$V(R)-V(r)=-\int\limits^R_r E(r)dr=-\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R^3}\int r dr = \frac{-Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R^3}(R^2-r^2)$

The potential at the surface, V(R), is that of a point charge, so

$V(R)=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}$

Therefore we can find the potential inside the sphere, V(r):

$V(r)=V(R)+\Delta V=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}+\frac{-Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R^3}(R^2-r^2)=\frac{Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R}(3-\frac{r^2}{R^2})$

2)

At the center,

r = 0

Therefore the potential at the center of the sphere is:

$V(r)=\frac{Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R}(3-\frac{r^2}{R^2})\\V(0)=\frac{3Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R}$

On the other hand, the potential at the surface is

$V(R)=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}$

Therefore, the ratio V(center)/V(surface) is:

$\frac{V(0)}{V(R)}=\frac{\frac{3Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 R}}{\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}}=\frac{3}{2}$

3)

The graph of V versus r can be found in attachment.

We observe the following:

- At r = 0, the value of the potential is $\frac{3}{2}V(R)$ , as found in part b) (where $V(R)=\frac{Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 R}$ )

- Between r and R, the potential decreases as $-\frac{r^2}{R^2}$

- Then at r = R, the potential is $V(R)$

- Between r = R and r = 3R, the potential decreases as $\frac{1}{R}$ , therefore when the distance is tripled (r=3R), the potential as decreased to 1/3 ( $\frac{1}{3}V(R)$ )

Learn more about electric fields and potential:

brainly.com/question/8960054

brainly.com/question/4273177

#LearnwithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

A small object begins a free-fall from a height of =81.5 m at 0=0 s . After τ=2.20 s , a second small object is launched vertica

-BARSIC- [3]

Answer:

33.2 m

Explanation:

For the first object:

y₀ = 81.5 m

v₀ = 0 m/s

a = -9.8 m/s²

t₀ = 0 s

y = y₀ + v₀ t + ½ at²

y = 81.5 − 4.9t²

For the second object:

y₀ = 0 m

v₀ = 40.0 m/s

a = -9.8 m/s²

t₀ = 2.20 s

y = y₀ + v₀ t + ½ at²

y = 40(t−2.2) − 4.9(t−2.2)²

When they meet:

81.5 − 4.9t² = 40(t−2.2) − 4.9(t−2.2)²

81.5 − 4.9t² = 40t − 88 − 4.9 (t² − 4.4t + 4.84)

81.5 − 4.9t² = 40t − 88 − 4.9t² + 21.56t − 23.716

81.5 = 61.56t − 111.716

193.216 = 61.56t

t = 3.139

The position at that time is:

y = 81.5 − 4.9(3.139)²

y = 33.2

7 0

3 years ago

Which has more momentum, a speeding baseball or an ocean liner at rest in a harbor?

uranmaximum [27]

Momentum is (mass) times (speed), so nothing that is at rest has any momentum. If the battleship is at rest, then a mosquito in flight, a leaf falling from a tree, and your speedy baseball each have more momentum than the ship has.

4 0

3 years ago

Which was more difficult to determine (latitude or longitude) and why?

Ivenika [448]

Longitude was. Determining longitude requires knowing the exact time of day, which was difficult prior to modern clocks. The source book below tells the story of Englishman John Harrison's life-long pursuit of building a reliable clock and its importance to navigation.

7 0

3 years ago