Answer:
2.835 moles of carbon
Explanation:
By definition, there are 6.022x10^23 atoms (or compounds) in one mole.
Write and use this as a conversion factor:
(6.022x10^23 atoms)/mole
(1.707 x 10^24 atoms of carbon)/((6.022x10^23 atoms)/mole) = 2.835 moles carbon
Yes, it is the power of material evidence that wins.
- Evidence used to support or refute a scientific theory or hypothesis is known as material evidence.
- Evidence is also used by scientists in various contexts, such as when they apply ideas to real-world issues.
- Whether a person accepts the data as proof depends on their presumptions or views regarding how observations relate to a theory.
- A creative hypothesis is developed by a scientist and may be refuted by testing it against evidence or established truths.
- Evidence can refute a hypothesis by demonstrating facts that are at odds with it. In contrast, the presence of evidence does not preclude the possibility of future, undiscovered evidence supporting the idea.
Therefore, it is the power of material evidence that wins, not the authority of experts that
proves an answer in Science.
Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/606806
#SPJ9
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Recall that Δ<em>H</em> is the sum of the heats of formation of the products minus the heat of formation of the reactants multiplied by their respective coefficients. That is:

Therefore, from the chemical equation, we have that:
![\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (-317\text{ kJ/mol}) = \left[\Delta H^\circ_f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} + \Delta H^\circ_f \text{ H$_2$O} \right] -\left[3 \Delta H^\circ_f \text{ H$_2$}+\Delta H^\circ_f \text{ N$_2$O}\right] \end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20%28-317%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%2B%20%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20H%24_2%24O%7D%20%20%5Cright%5D%20%20%20-%5Cleft%5B3%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20H%24_2%24%7D%2B%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24O%7D%5Cright%5D%20%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
Remember that the heat of formation of pure elements (e.g. H₂) are zero. Substitute in known values and solve for hydrazine:
![\displaystyle \begin{aligned} (-317\text{ kJ/mol}) & = \left[ \Delta H^\circ _f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} + (-285.8\text{ kJ/mol})\right] -\left[ 3(0) + (82.1\text{ kJ/mol})\right] \\ \\ \Delta H^\circ _f \text{ N$_2$H$_4$} & = (-317 + 285.8 + 82.1)\text{ kJ/mol} \\ \\ & = 50.9\text{ kJ/mol} \end{aligned}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cbegin%7Baligned%7D%20%28-317%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%20%26%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5B%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc%20_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%2B%20%28-285.8%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%5Cright%5D%20-%5Cleft%5B%203%280%29%20%2B%20%2882.1%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%29%5Cright%5D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%5CDelta%20H%5E%5Ccirc%20_f%20%5Ctext%7B%20N%24_2%24H%24_4%24%7D%20%26%20%3D%20%28-317%20%2B%20285.8%20%2B%2082.1%29%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%20%5C%5C%20%5C%5C%20%26%20%3D%2050.9%5Ctext%7B%20kJ%2Fmol%7D%20%5Cend%7Baligned%7D)
In conclusion, our answer is A.
Answer:
(a) 
(b) Rubidium
Explanation:
Hello,
This titration is carried out by assuming that the volume of base doesn't have a significant change when the mass is added, thus, we state the following data a apply the down below formula to compute the molarity of the base solution:

Solving for the molarity of base we've got:

Now, we can compute the moles of the base as:

(a) Now, one divides the provided mass over the previously computed moles to get the molecular mass of the unknown base:

(b) Subtracting the atomic mass of oxygen and hydrogen, the metal's atomic mass turns out into:

So, that atomic mass dovetails to the Rubidium's atomic mass.
Best regards.
Answer:

Raoult's law states that the vapor pressure of a solvent above a solution is equal to the vapor pressure of the pure solvent at the same temperature scaled by the mole fraction of the solvent present: Psolution=χsolventPosolvent.