Answer:
a) True. The number of photoelectrons is proportional to the amount (intensity) of the incident beam. From the expression above we see that threshold frequency cannot emit electrons.
b) λ = c / f
Therefore, as the wavelength increases, the frequency decreases and therefore the energy of the photoelectrons emitted,
c) threshold energy
h f =Ф
Explanation:
It's photoelectric effect was fully explained by Einstein by the expression
Knox = h f - fi
Where K is the kinetic energy of the photoelectrons, f the frequency of the incident radiation and fi the work function of the metal
a) True. The number of photoelectrons is proportional to the amount (intensity) of the incident beam. From the expression above we see that threshold frequency cannot emit electrons.
b) wavelength is related to frequency
λ = c / f
Therefore, as the wavelength increases, the frequency decreases and therefore the energy of the photoelectrons emitted, so there is a wavelength from which electrons cannot be removed from the metal.
c) As the work increases, more frequency radiation is needed to remove the electrons, because there is a threshold energy
h f =Ф
Answer:
14
Explanation:
A sound wave in a steel rail has a frequency of 620 Hz and a wavelength of 10.5 m. What is the speed of sound in steel? U f = ? S f = 3 x 108 m/s) / 0.06 m 14 so it will be 14
Answer:
Current, I = 0.0011 A
Explanation:
It is given that,
Diameter of rod, d = 2.56 cm
Radius of rod, r = 1.28 cm = 0.0128 m
The resistivity of the pure silicon, 
Length of rod, l = 20 cm = 0.2 m
Voltage, 
The resistivity of the rod is given by :
R = 893692.30 ohms
Current flowing in the rod is calculated using Ohm's law as :
V = I R
I = 0.0011 A
So, the current flowing in the rod is 0.0011 A. Hence, this is the required solution.
A big part of the reason that mirrors are seldom if ever used to generate
electricity is the simple fact that there is no way to generate electricity using
mirrors. They are as useless for the purpose as smoke is, although there are
those who have used both items simultaneously to create the impression that
they have succeeded in that attempt.
<span>B) 0.6 N
I suspect you have a minor error in your question. Claiming a coefficient of static friction of 0.30N is nonsensical. Putting the Newton there is incorrect. The figure of 0.25 for the coefficient of kinetic friction looks OK. So with that correction in mind, let's solve the problem.
The coefficient of static friction is the multiplier to apply to the normal force in order to start the object moving. And the coefficient of kinetic friction (which is usually smaller than the coefficient of static friction) is the multiplied to the normal force in order to keep the object moving. You've been given a normal force of 2N, so you need to multiply the coefficient of static friction by that in order to get the amount of force it takes to start the shoe moving. So:
0.30 * 2N = 0.6N
And if you look at your options, you'll see that option "B" matches exactly.</span>
