Answer:
pH = 3.65
Explanation:
given data
pKa of HNO2 = 3.40
nitrous acid (HNO2) = 0.110 M
NaNO2 = 0.200 M
to find out
What is the pH
solution
we get here ph for acidic buffer that is express as
pH = pKa + log(salt÷acid) ........................1
put here value and we get
pH = 3.40 + log(0.200÷0.110)
pH = 3.65
<span>Colligative properties are properties of solutions that depend on the number of molecules [or ions] in a given volume of solvent and not on the properties (e.g. size or mass) of the compound. Colligative properties include: lowering of vapor pressure; elevation of boiling point; depression of freezing point and osmotic pressure.</span>
Answer:
the answer that you are looking for is d
Explanation:
Answer:
Ammonia is the richest source of nitrogen on a mass percentage basis because it has 82.35% of nitrogen by mass.
Explanation:
Percentage of element in compound :
(a) Urea, 
Molar mass of urea = 60 g/mol
Atomic mass of nitrogen = 14 g/mol
Number of nitrogen atoms = 2
(b) Ammonium nitrate, 
Molar mass of ammonium nitrate = 80 g/mol
Atomic mass of nitrogen = 14 g/mol
Number of nitrogen atoms = 2
(c) Nitric oxide, NO
Molar mass of nitric oxide = 30 g/mol
Atomic mass of nitrogen = 14 g/mol
Number of nitrogen atoms = 1
(d) Ammonia, 
Molar mass of ammona = 17 g/mol
Atomic mass of nitrogen = 14 g/mol
Number of nitrogen atoms = 1
Ammonia is the richest source of nitrogen on a mass percentage basis because it has 82.35% of nitrogen by mass.
Democritus *suggested* the existence of the atom, that everything was made up of tiny particles, but wasn't really able to get more specific than that. Dalton also theorized that everything was made up of indivisible particles, but went further basing his theory on actual scientific principles, such as the Law of Conservation of Mass and the Law of Constant Composition. He also said that atoms weren't created or destroyed in a chemical reaction, just rearranged. There's more to it than that, but basically, Dalton's theory was based more on science while Democritus' theory was too general to be useful in chemical situations.
