Explanation:
i think C . it is twice the size of the object
Answer:
Explanation:
Width of central diffraction peak is given by the following expression
Width of central diffraction peak= 2 λ D/ d₁
where d₁ is width of slit and D is screen distance and λ is wave length.
Width of other fringes become half , that is each of secondary diffraction fringe is equal to
λ D/ d₁
Width of central interference peak is given by the following expression
Width of each of bright fringe = λ D/ d₂
where d₂ is width of slit and D is screen distance and λ is wave length.
Now given that the central diffraction peak contains 13 interference fringes
so ( 2 λ D/ d₁) / λ D/ d₂ = 13
then ( λ D/ d₁) / λ D/ d₂ = 13 / 2
= 6.5
no of fringes contained within each secondary diffraction peak = 6.5
Answer:
I think it's option D
Explanation:
I think it's option D but not so sure
The words "... as shown ..." tell us that there's a picture that goes along
with this question, and you decided not to share it. That's sad and
disappointing, but I think the question can be answered without seeing
the picture.
The net force on the crate is zero. Evidence for this is that fact that
the crate is just sitting there. If the net force on an object is not zero,
then the object is accelerating ... it's either speeding up, slowing down,
or its the direction of its motion is changing. If none of these things is
happening, then the net force on the object must be zero.
