No.
The acceleration of gravity on or near Earth's surface is 9.8 m/s² ,
not 20 m/s² .
If it were 20 m/s², then you would weigh almost exactly double
what you really weigh now.
Answer:
The energy absorbed by the atomic electrons in the mercury atom is 
J
Explanation:
Given:
Potential 
V
According to the conservation law,
Loss in kinetic energy = Gain in potential energy
Here, energy absorbed by the atomic electrons is given by,
Where 
( charge of electron )
J
Therefore, the energy absorbed by the atomic electrons in the mercury atom is J
Ampere per meter squared A/m
The total electric potential at the center of the square due to the four charges is V = √2Q/πÈa.
<h3>What do you mean by electric potential? </h3>
The amount of work needed to move a unit charge from a reference point to a specific point against an electric field. It's SI unit is volt.
V = kq/r
Where V represents electric potential, K is coulomb constant, q is Charge and r is distance between any two around charge to the point charge.
Electric potential at O due to four charges is given by,
V = 4KQ/ r
where, r = √2a/2 = a/√2
V = 4k × Q√2/a
V = √2Q/πÈa
The total electric potential at the center of the square due to the four charges is V = √2Q/πÈa.
To learn more about electric potential refer to:
brainly.com/question/12645463
#SPJ4
Answer:
The first law, also called the law of inertia, was pioneered by Galileo. This was quite a conceptual leap because it was not possible in Galileo's time to observe a moving object without at least some frictional forces dragging against the motion. In fact, for over a thousand years before Galileo, educated individuals believed Aristotle's formulation that, wherever there is motion, there is an external force producing that motion.
The second law, $ f(t)=m\,a(t)$ , actually implies the first law, since when $ f(t)=0$ (no applied force), the acceleration $ a(t)$ is zero, implying a constant velocity $ v(t)$ . (The velocity is simply the integral with respect to time of $ a(t)={\dot v}(t)$ .)
Newton's third law implies conservation of momentum [138]. It can also be seen as following from the second law: When one object ``pushes'' a second object at some (massless) point of contact using an applied force, there must be an equal and opposite force from the second object that cancels the applied force. Otherwise, there would be a nonzero net force on a massless point which, by the second law, would accelerate the point of contact by an infinite amount.
Explanation:
