All categories

3 years ago

If each orbital can hold a maximum of two electrons, how many electrons can 2s hold?

Chemistry

1 answer:

RSB [31]3 years ago

6 0

Answer: 2

Explanation:

Each orbital can hold two electrons. This means that the 1s, 2s, 3s, 4s, etc., can each hold two electrons because they only contain one orbital

You might be interested in

Does it take more, less, or the same amount of heat to melt 1.0 kg of ice at 0°C, or to bring 1.0 kg of liquid water at 0°C to t

Murljashka [212]

Answer : It takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

Solution :

The process involved in this problem are :

$(1):H_2O(s)(0^oC)\rightarrow H_2O(l)(0^oC)\\\\(2):H_2O(l)(0^oC)\rightarrow H_2O(l)(100^oC)$

Now we have to calculate the amount of heat released or absorbed in both processes.

For process 1 :

$Q_1=m\times \Delta H_{fusion}$

where,

$Q_1$ = amount of heat absorbed = ?

m = mass of water or ice = 1.0 Kg

$\Delta H_{fusion}$ = enthalpy change for fusion = $3.35\times 10^5J/Kg$

Now put all the given values in $Q_1$ , we get:

$Q_1=1.0Kg\times 3.35\times 10^5J/Kg=3.35\times 10^5J$

For process 2 :

$Q_2=m\times c_{p,l}\times (T_{final}-T_{initial})$

where,

$Q_2$ = amount of heat absorbed = ?

m = mass of water = 1.0 Kg

$c_{p,l}$ = specific heat of liquid water = $4186J/Kg^oC$

$T_1$ = initial temperature = $0^oC$

$T_2$ = final temperature = $100^oC$

Now put all the given values in $Q_2$ , we get:

$Q_2=1.0Kg\times 4186J/Kg^oC\times (100-0)^oC$

$Q_2=4.186\times 10^5J$

From this we conclude that, $Q_1$ that means it takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

Hence, the it takes less amount of heat to metal 1.0 Kg of ice.

5 0

3 years ago

Which statement explains why a C–O bond is

Nataly_w [17]

Answer: (3) The difference in electronegativity between carbon and oxygen is greater than that between fluorine and oxygen.

Explanation: Polarity of a molecule is due to the difference in electronegativity of the atoms. More is the electronegativity difference, more is the polarity.

Electronegativity of carbon = 2.5

Electronegativity of oxygen = 3.5

Electronegativity of fluorine = 4.0

Thus the difference in electronegativity of carbon and oxygen is=(3.5-2.5)= 1.0

Thus the difference in electronegativity of fluorine and oxygen is=(4.0-3.5)= 0.5.

Thus C-O bond is more polar than F-O bond.

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

After reviewing your answers to questions 2 and 4 above, would you define boiling point and melting point as a periodic table fa

Andru [333]

The periodic table, and its respective melting and boiling points. ... Chemistry.2 The student will investigate and understand that the placement of elements ... Families/groups ... As you analyze your graph, try to answer the following questions: ... period. How would you describe the trend in boiling point as the atomic number ...

8 0

4 years ago

Identify the name of the compound that goes with this chemical compound

postnew [5]

What is the chemical compound?

8 0

3 years ago

Which statement best describes the light that will cause emission of electrons from a given metal through the photoelectric effe

Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

light with a high enough intensity

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago