All categories

3 years ago

Why do some people, especially those in the music industry, think analog recordings are better?

Chemistry

2 answers:

Minchanka [31]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Analog sound tends to be warmer, has more texture and is thought to capture a truer representation of the actual sound.

Explanation:

Hello,

Due to the fact that analog sound tends to be warmer, has more texture and is thought to capture a truer representation of the actual sound it is preferred by the people belonging to the music industry even when it is more expensive than digital recordings which felt to be somewhat cold, technical and perhaps lacking in analog’s nuance but very cheap in comparison with the analog recordings.

Best regards.

max2010maxim [7]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

Analog recordings copy the original sound.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

Using the graph below please draw a reaction potential energy diagram for a reaction with the

azamat

Answer:

Explanation:

because it is the sam

7 0

2 years ago

the elements carbon hydrogen and oxygen are all part of the same blank on the periodic table........ i i think GROUP diangol row

Mrrafil [7]

The elements Carbon, Hydrogen, and Oxygen are all part of Non-Metals.

Hope This Helps! :)

6 0

3 years ago

Ethanoic acid, CH3COOH, ionizes to form an ethanoate ion (CH3COO-) in aqueous solution. what else does it form? is it a monoprot

barxatty [35]

Ethanoic acid ionizes in aqueous solutions to form two ions which are $CH_3COO^-$ and $H^+$

<h3>Ionization of ethanoic acid</h3>

Ethanoic acid goes by the chemical formula $CH_3COOH$ .

In aqueous solutions, it ionizes as a monoprotic acid according to the following equation:

$CH_3COOH ---- > CH_3COO^- + H^+$

A monoprotic acid is an acid that is able to donate only a proton. Hence, ethanoic acid is said to be monoprotic because it ionizes in aqueous solutions to produce a single $H^+$

More on ethanoic acid can be found here: brainly.com/question/9991017

#SPJ1

8 0

2 years ago

What is the electron configuration for<br> 08<br> 16

Elis [28]

The electron configuration for Oxygen : [He] 2s²2p⁴

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

Writing electron configurations starts from the lowest to the highest sub-shell energy level. There are 4 sub-shells in the shell of an atom, namely s, p, d, and f. The maximum number of electrons for each sub-shell is

• s: 2 electrons

• p: 6 electrons

• d: 10 electrons and

• f: 14 electrons

Charging electrons in the sub-shell uses the following sequence:

The element is Oxgen, with symbol O, and :

the atomic number=8=number of electron

the atomic mass=16

The electron configuration based on the number of electrons(for Oxygen=8), so the configuration :

$\tt _8^{16}O:1s^22s^22p^4$ or we can write with noble gas [He] 2s²2p⁴

3 0

2 years ago

How many atoms are there in 8.88 g Si?

Mariana [72]

Answer:

$\boxed {\boxed {\sf 1.90 \times 10^{23} \ atoms \ Si}}$

Explanation:

We are asked to find how many atoms are in 8.88 grams of silicon.

<h3>1. Grams to Moles </h3>

First, we convert grams to moles. We use the molar mass or the mass of 1 mole of a substance. These values are found on the Periodic Table as they are equal to the atomic masses, but the units are grams per mole instead of atomic mass units.

Look up silicon's molar mass.

Si: 28.085 g/mol

We will convert using dimensional analysis. Set up a conversion factor with the molar mass.

$\frac { 28.085 \ g \ Si}{1 \ mol \ Si}$

We are converting 8.88 grams of silicon to moles, so we multiply by this value.

$8.88 \ g \ Si *\frac { 28.085 \ g \ Si}{1 \ mol \ Si}$

Flip the fraction so the units of grams of silicon cancel.

$8.88 \ g \ Si *\frac{1 \ mol \ Si} { 28.085 \ g \ Si}$

$8.88 *\frac{1 \ mol \ Si} { 28.085 }$

$\frac {8.88} { 28.085 } \ mol \ Si$

$0.316183015845 \ mol \ Si$

<h3>2. Moles to Atoms </h3>

Next, we convert moles to atoms. We use Avogadro's Number or 6.022 × 10²³. This is the number of particles (atoms, molecules, formula units, etc.) in 1 mole of a substance. In this case, the particles are atoms of silicon.

Set up another conversion factor.

$\frac {6.022 \times 10^{23} \ atoms \ Si}{1 \ mol \ Si}$