Answer:
Erosion is the washing away of the uppermost part of the earth crust. Once erosion starts it only gets worse because, erosion wash away further soil, causing the eroding channel to futher expand, increasing the erosion.
Lack of vegetative cover allows erosion which washes away soil nutrients, further worsening the soil against soil vegetative cover.
I think you just do 11.29 multiplied by 186 since to find density you divide mass by volume. So 186 divided by x is 11.29. So in conclusion the volume would be 2,099.94mL
Answer:
So first thing to do in these types of problems is write out your chemical reaction and balance it:
Mg + O2 --> MgO
Then you need to start thinking about moles of Magnesium for moles of Magnesium Oxide. Based on the above equation 1 mole of Magnesium is needed to make one mole of Magnesium Oxide.
To get moles of magnesium you need to take the grams you started with (.418) and convert to moles by dividing by molecular weight of Mg (24.305), this gives you .0172 moles of Mg.
The theoretical yield would be the assumption that 100% of the magnesium will be converted into Magnesium Oxide, so you would get, based on the first equation, .0172 mol of MgO. Multiplying this by the molecular weight of MgO (24.305+16) gives us .693 g of MgO.
The percent yield is what you actually got in the experiment, and for this you subtract off the total mass from the crucible mass, or 27.374 - 26.687, which gives .66 g of MgO obtained.
Percent yield is acutal/theoretical, .66/.693, or 95.24%.
I'll let you do the same for the second trial, and average percent yield is just an average of the two trials percent yield.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The sample must contain impurity that is lower in atomic mass to sodium and since potassium has higher atomic mass to sodium, the answer is the sample contains NaCl and LiCl. We are sure already that the sample is not pure which rules out option a and option b contains sodium iodide which cannot contribute to the increase in chlorine
