1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
7

Elle is playing with a ball in a bus that moves in a straight line with constant velocity. What can you say about the motion of

the ball in the moving bus if Elle throws the ball vertically upwards?
a the ball will fall back to her

b the ball will land ahead of her

c the ball will land behind her

d the ball will move to the right
Physics
1 answer:
kramer3 years ago
8 0
Given that they are all on the same bus that is travelling in a straight line at the same velocity, when Elle throws the ball directly upwards, the ball will simply fall back to her. This is because the bus, Elle, and the ball are all travelling in the same direction and at the same speed. Among the choices, the correct answer is A.
You might be interested in
Imagine that you are working as a roller coaster designer. You want to build a record breaking coaster that goes 70.0 m/s at the
Rzqust [24]

Wow !  This is not simple.  At first, it looks like there's not enough information, because we don't know the mass of the cars.  But I"m pretty sure it turns out that we don't need to know it.

At the top of the first hill, the car's potential energy is

                                  PE = (mass) x (gravity) x (height) .

At the bottom, the car's kinetic energy is

                                 KE = (1/2) (mass) (speed²) .

You said that the car's speed is 70 m/s at the bottom of the hill,
and you also said that 10% of the energy will be lost on the way
down.  So now, here comes the big jump.  Put a comment under
my answer if you don't see where I got this equation:

                                   KE = 0.9  PE

        (1/2) (mass) (70 m/s)² = (0.9) (mass) (gravity) (height)     

Divide each side by (mass): 

               (0.5) (4900 m²/s²) = (0.9) (9.8 m/s²) (height)

(There goes the mass.  As long as the whole thing is 90% efficient,
the solution will be the same for any number of cars, loaded with
any number of passengers.)

Divide each side by (0.9):

               (0.5/0.9) (4900 m²/s²) = (9.8 m/s²) (height)

Divide each side by (9.8 m/s²):

               Height = (5/9)(4900 m²/s²) / (9.8 m/s²)

                          =  (5 x 4900 m²/s²) / (9 x 9.8 m/s²)

                          =  (24,500 / 88.2)  (m²/s²) / (m/s²)

                          =        277-7/9    meters
                                  (about 911 feet)
3 0
3 years ago
Hello,help me with this out please i need it hurry but please ensure your answer is correct..I attach here with my question.
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

.409 N

Explanation:

For this to balance, the moments around the fulcrum must sum to zero.

On the left you have   .21   ( is that down? I will assume it is)

      Counterclockwise moments :

        .21 * 40     +  1.0 * 20    

     Clockwise moments :

        .5 * 20     +     F * 45

these moments must equal each other

.21*40 + 1 *20   =  .5 * 20 + F * 45

   F = .409 N

7 0
2 years ago
If T, = 40 N, find T, and the mass of the weight (W).
seraphim [82]

Answer:4kg

Explanation:

acceleration due to gravity(g)=10m/s^2

Weight(w)=40N

Weight=mass x g

40=mass x 10

Divide both sides by 10

Mass =40/10

Mass=4kg

5 0
3 years ago
Explain why it takes more energy to remove the second electron from a lithium atom than it does to remove the fourth electron fr
slava [35]
It takes more energy to remove the second electron from a lithium atom than it does to remove the fourth electron from a carbon atom because its inner core e, not valence e. C's 4th removed e is still a valence e. And also <span>because more nuclear charge acting on the second electron, it is more close to the nucleus, thus the the protons attract it more than the 4th electron.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
25 PTs
Nuetrik [128]
Answer:
They are both wrong!

Liquid oxygen really is a pale blue color.
I’ve seen it.

And they cant say that liquid and solid oxygen is blue which makes the sky blue because they’re not and it doesn’t make up for the color of the sky.

The sky is actually blue because It reflects more light than It can absorb
aka Rayleigh Scattering.

-HOPE THAT HELPED
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is diffraction?
    15·1 answer
  • Take a look at the pic and please help me
    5·1 answer
  • During a 0.001 s interval while it is between the plates, the change of the momentum of the electron Δp with arrow is &lt; 0, -8
    8·1 answer
  • I NEED HELP ASAP!!!
    9·1 answer
  • If a net force of 25 N is exerted over a distance of 4 m to the right on a 2 kg mass initially at rest and moves it, what is the
    11·1 answer
  • Explain how carbon is cycled between the hydrosphere and geosphere. Use specific examples.
    7·1 answer
  • 1. How would the motion of a pendulum change at high altitude like a high mountain top? How would the motion change under weight
    7·1 answer
  • A skydiver falls out of a plane from rest, and experiences no air resistance. Eventually, this skydiver reaches a velocity of 33
    13·1 answer
  • If you jump upward with a speed of 1.70 m/s how high will you be when you stop rising?
    13·1 answer
  • What’s better csp or pv ?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!