1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nina [5.8K]
3 years ago
9

A 190 g rock at 20°C is completely immersed in 600 g of water at 80°C. Which one of the following statements is true right after

the rock goes in?
A. The water gives the rock thermal energy and gets no thermal energy in return.
B. The rock and the water give each other thermal energy, but the water gives more than it gets.
C. The rock gives the water thermal energy and gets no thermal energy in return.
D. It depends on the specific heat of the rock.
E. The rock and the water give each other thermal energy, but the rock gives more than it gets
Physics
1 answer:
Umnica [9.8K]3 years ago
8 0

Rock is completely immersed in hot water. By the second law of thermodynamics, thermal energy or heat is transferred from substance with higher temperature to substance with lower temperature until they come to thermal equilibrium i.e. both at same temperature.

It is given here that rock is at 20°C which is at lower temperature than water at 80°C. ∴Heat or thermal energy flows from water to rock. So, right choice is-

A. The water gives the rock thermal energy and gets no thermal energy in return.

You might be interested in
B. Interpret Data Solution A has a pH of 1.6.
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

Solution A has a pH of 6 and solution B has a pH of 8. Which of the following is true regarding the concentration of hydrogen ions in each solution? A) A has 100 times greater H+ concentration than B. B) B has 100 times greater H+ concentration than A. C) A has 7/9 of the H+ concentration of B. D) A has 9/7 of the H+ concentration of B. E) none of these

Explanation:

Hey im super sorry if i get this wrong :)

6 0
2 years ago
A force of 500 N acts horizontally on a 10,000 g body. What is its horizontal acceleration
Paladinen [302]
200n because it's 2×5=10so maybe try solving the problem like that ok does that help
8 0
3 years ago
ASAP do all will give 25 per person pls will mark brainiest
neonofarm [45]

Answer:

1) true

2) false

3) false

4) true

5) true

6) true

7) true

8) false

9) true

10) false

i think these are correct if im wrong on a few im sorry. Hope this helps at least a bit. And if i do get some wrong you know just to pick the opposite answer.

4 0
3 years ago
An unknown fluid flows at a speed of 31 m/s. Suppose the fluid has a mass of 47 kg runs at this speed. What is the fluid’s kinet
Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

22583.5J

Explanation:

KE=1/2 mv^2

=1/2*47Kg*(31m/s^2)

=23.5Kg * 961m/s^2

=22583.5J

7 0
2 years ago
How would improvement in use of renewable energy sources impact climate change sea-level rise?
bonufazy [111]

Answer:

Almost immeasurably small.

Explanation:

The STORY is that humans are BAD for the environment and have caused a HUGE change in the amount of CO₂ in the atmosphere.

Let's look at the reports and draw our own conclusions.

Current CO₂ levels are 409.8 parts per million (PPM)

at the beginning of the Industrial revolution in the 1700's, the presumed beginning of the huge increase in CO₂ the level was about 280 PPM

For perspective lets assume we capture the whole atmosphere and squish it down to 2400 one liter bottles of air

That's 100 cases of 24 bottles per case.

We now separate all the air components into their own bottles

Nitrogen is 78% of our air, so we subtract 78 cases from our 100 leaving 22

Subtracting Oxygen at 21% of air leaves 1 case of liter bottles left

Of those 24 bottles, Argon makes up 0.93% of air so we subtract 22 bottles

The remaining two bottles contain all of the other gasses in our air, One of those bottles contains CO₂.

If we take the CO₂ levels from the 1700's at about 280 PPM as a baseline and assume ALL of the increase is human caused, that is (410 -280) / 280 = 46 % of the total.

The human caused addition of CO₂ would be 460 mililiters out of 2400 liters over the course of 250 years 

The claim is, that less than half of a liter of CO₂ out of 2400 liters of air is responsible for heating not only the gas in all the other bottles but also the surface of the earth itself.

Personally, it boggles my mind.

And it says NOTHING of a far more powerful greenhouse gas that is far more prevalent in the atmosphere...water vapor.

Water vapor is about 1% of air at sea level and about 0.4% overall. It was not considered in the above analysis because water vapor can condense out and is not a constant in the air.

Notice that there is about 100 times the amount of water vapor in the air as compared to CO₂. Water vapor also has between 4 and 8 times the greenhouse effect that CO₂ does.

Makes one wonder why we choose to pick on CO₂.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which example describes a nonrenewable resource? In some areas in California, people can use heat found deep in the Earth to hea
    5·2 answers
  • The jovian moon with the most geologically active surface is
    13·1 answer
  • Select the best statement
    5·1 answer
  • Why are large astronomical bodies such as planets and stars round
    14·2 answers
  • Which statements accurately describe mechanical waves? Check all that apply.
    6·2 answers
  • Describe why we cannot see details on the surface of Mars.​
    15·2 answers
  • Gold can be found in native or pure state in nature, why​
    9·1 answer
  • What would happen to the two balls if one of them were kept positively charged and the charge on the other ball were slowly incr
    11·1 answer
  • What else is produced when sodium carbonate decomposes
    7·1 answer
  • A current of 1.3 A passes through a lamp with a resistance of 5 Ohms. What is the power supplied to the lamp in Watts
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!